BuzzerBeater Forums

Sure, I agree with you regarding more tactics more skills but no change will be introduced this season. Regarding arena, I simply noted that there is someone able to earn 3 times more than my revenue and I will try to follow his strategy.
The idea to related PR lvl to the arena size for me it was great (:D), this is a way to introduce a "taxation" same for everyone. All of us knows that PR is useless now

All of us knows that PR is useless now

::sigh::

yeah the PR guy.. and also as ive just got on another reply STH... 2 more varaibles..........

PR Guy... diff between lvl 2 (ive got) and lvl 5 (i had) difference is negligable.
STH (Capped) and most teams in Div 1 have achieved this.

So nice features but again we are all getting pretty much the same as each other from them.

All of us knows that PR is useless now

::sigh::

Ah Juice...




Santa Claus doesn't exist!


:D :p

Now you've gone too far.

LOCK.BAN.DELETE

ASD!


Excuse me for the OT, I coudn't resist ;)

I fully agree with everything you have stated in this thread.
It was much easier to expand the arena a few seasons ago than it is now. And this is a fact.
As I stated in other threads, the economy for teams starting now in low divisions is probably a bit too tough and not much fun.

of course expanding was easier when inflation was running wild and the top teams were buying players for something like 6-8 millions because the price of new seats is the same now as it was then
of course if i spend every $ in players there's no point in complaining when my salaries reach my weekly income and suddenly i stop making money

of course if i spend every $ in players there's no point in complaining when my salaries reach my weekly income and suddenly i stop making money

odd, i dont see anyone in this thread that fits that description.

I fully agree with everything you have stated in this thread.
It was much easier to expand the arena a few seasons ago than it is now. And this is a fact.
As I stated in other threads, the economy for teams starting now in low divisions is probably a bit too tough and not much fun.

of course expanding was easier when inflation was running wild and the top teams were buying players for something like 6-8 millions because the price of new seats is the same now as it was then
of course if i spend every $ in players there's no point in complaining when my salaries reach my weekly income and suddenly i stop making money

have you even read my post?
Where am I complaining? where am I talking about myself?
NEW TEAMS starting in LOW DIVISIONS.

Last edited by Newton07 at 2/23/2009 5:15:26 PM

I fully agree with everything you have stated in this thread.
It was much easier to expand the arena a few seasons ago than it is now. And this is a fact.
As I stated in other threads, the economy for teams starting now in low divisions is probably a bit too tough and not much fun.

of course expanding was easier when inflation was running wild and the top teams were buying players for something like 6-8 millions because the price of new seats is the same now as it was then
of course if i spend every $ in players there's no point in complaining when my salaries reach my weekly income and suddenly i stop making money

have you even read my post?
Where am I complaining? where am I talking about myself?
NEW TEAMS starting in LOW DIVISIONS.

new teams starting in low divisions better start upgrading their arena as soon as they've bought a couple of youngsters to train, BEFORE they promote
the "buy players, win now, upgrade tomorrow (maybe)" mentality that was the best strategy in season 3 won't work anymore

We are all on the same conveyor belt - we will all someday have Wondrous JS Wondrous OD guards and Wondrous Big men and we will all have very similar team ratings.. (you can see from the PL's we are already closely bunched together.)

By "All" do you mean the top 100 or so teams in BB? I cant even see that conveyor belt yet.

People keep saying that a softcap will somehow punish teams that invested early. That investment and the advantage gained will remain persistant. If we use Hambourg again as an example, he invested early and with a 50k softcap would still be way ahead of most teams. If he stopped at the softcap, it would still require other teams competing with him to spend the same money he did to get where he is at, its no punishment. He would also be collecting the higher revenue of the bigger stadium until his competition caught him in arena size. In that time his higher revenue, not being spent on arena like the others, would allow top training and better players. The teams behind him are still behind him in this scenario, where is the punishment? Further down the line when everyone in his and the II series would have the same size arena (if they respected the softcap) but he would be making more revenue from his arena than those in II trying to catch him, still at an advantage, but not an insurmountable one. Now it would require several strategies to remain at the top, instead of the heavily wieghted 'cash is king' effect.

Are we trying to make the game a little more balanced for everyone involved or just protecting Sacred Cows?