BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Make the best players actually desirable

Make the best players actually desirable

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
158188.126 in reply to 158188.125
Date: 10/16/2010 10:20:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
if you haven't noticed it yet, i'm not bringing my opinion about the best players here. and to answer your question i don't know.

This Post:
00
158188.127 in reply to 158188.126
Date: 10/16/2010 10:28:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
No one in this thread is questioning about the fact that the highest salary player aren't necessarily the best skilled players
But the best players in every single position are generally the players with the best primary skills,right?

The point is that,the best players at some position(mainly big mans) are not affordable by the best teams because of salary formula,without losing competitivity

Now,you can say that you find this situation good or bad,explaining why with your arguments,but you can't escape from this starting point



Last edited by Steve Karenn at 10/16/2010 10:29:07 AM

From: Rycka

This Post:
00
158188.128 in reply to 158188.124
Date: 10/16/2010 10:31:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
b) If you watch the transfer list for a while, you will see a few real-existing "500k monsters" that no 250k player will be able to outplay, certainly not at C.


just an example: (12159). neither team played inside. but 250k salary center on spain's roster performed better than 500k center of lithuanians team

This Post:
11
158188.129 in reply to 158188.128
Date: 10/16/2010 10:44:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Hard to imagine that a center will perform better in a slow than in a run and gut offense...

This Post:
00
158188.130 in reply to 158188.129
Date: 10/16/2010 10:50:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
look at fg% and rebounds. 250k player defended and rebounded better than 500k player. both teams played same defensive tactics. don't just look to points, consider defense also.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
158188.131 in reply to 158188.130
Date: 10/16/2010 10:54:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
then you should considere the teammates too, and yes the offense also affects rebounding at least in the rating(and the rebounding rating seems to me the most usefull Rating).

From: Rycka

This Post:
00
158188.132 in reply to 158188.131
Date: 10/16/2010 11:00:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
yeah i do understand that there's many things to consider, but what i wanted to say with that example is that it's not impossible that 250k won't perform better than a 500k player.

This Post:
00
158188.133 in reply to 158188.132
Date: 10/16/2010 11:03:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I would be pleased if you answer to my last post

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 10/16/2010 11:03:51 AM

This Post:
00
158188.134 in reply to 158188.127
Date: 10/16/2010 11:13:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
But the best players in every single position are generally the players with the best primary skills,right?


im not sure it's always right.

The point is that,the best players at some position(mainly big mans) are not affordable by the best teams because of salary formula,without losing competitivity


this again implies that the best players are the highest wage players, and BB-Patrick was saying you should separate this.

Now,you can say that you find this situation good or bad,explaining why with your arguments,but you can't escape from this starting point


i don't know it's good or bad.

This Post:
00
158188.135 in reply to 158188.130
Date: 10/16/2010 11:18:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
look at fg% and rebounds. 250k player defended and rebounded better than 500k player. both teams played same defensive tactics. don't just look to points, consider defense also.


We don't know the stamina value of both players, that has a huge influence on the individual ratings too - so a discussion based on a single event won't take us anywhere...

This Post:
00
158188.136 in reply to 158188.134
Date: 10/16/2010 11:24:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404


The point is that,the best players at some position(mainly big mans) are not affordable by the best teams because of salary formula,without losing competitivity


this again implies that the best players are the highest wage players, and BB-Patrick was saying you should separate this.

When the best and highest salary player coincide,you can't just separate this.It's a non-sense

Now,you can say that you find this situation good or bad,explaining why with your arguments,but you can't escape from this starting point


i don't know it's good or bad.

It's the nucleus of the thread,I don't understand why you feel the need to post in this thread if you don't want to talk of this argument

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 10/16/2010 11:27:12 AM

Advertisement