BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Economy

Economy (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: zyler

This Post:
00
152075.129 in reply to 152075.128
Date: 7/23/2010 4:45:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
the majority of the time the truth is a,b or c.

your 1st suggestion is a good one though , it ill increase the value of training and help fix a few problems.


This Post:
00
152075.130 in reply to 152075.128
Date: 7/23/2010 4:45:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
So spread betting on when the BB's will pull the plug on free agents?

I'll say 3rd August.

I still cant work out how the game can attract and LOSE 3,000-3,500 managers a WEEK!

Does that really mean in a space of a season if we can keep everyone interested we could be close to 100,000 users.. that in itself changes the dynamics of the economy significantly.


This Post:
00
152075.132 in reply to 152075.131
Date: 7/23/2010 5:18:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
About the rebuilding strategy that some Tai team seems to do effficiently I think that if some team would do it in spain he would lose the category but not only 1 but maybe 2 or 3 levels until the team is again competitive. He could go from 1 division to 4 division easily, and go up again has an economical cost.

This Post:
00
152075.133 in reply to 152075.132
Date: 7/23/2010 5:24:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
circles - round - in - going

Somethings wrong if the game is losing 3,000 managers a week and we have a net minus of users (albeit marginal)

Slowing down the supply of free agents or stopping them entirely must be worth an effort or are the BB's happy with the monetary reward for training right now?

This Post:
00
152075.134 in reply to 152075.133
Date: 7/23/2010 5:31:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Free agent market could be the answer. Weather to cut down the number of them making to market (who will decide which ones will be cropped?) or stopping them entirely would be the best idea. We all still remember what happened to the prices before they were introduced again in order to lower the prices. I am sure BB's are on top of this matter and we really can't say that stopping free agents will not raise those prices to idiotic heights again.
Have some faith in BB's, after all they have created a great game.

Last edited by Kukoc at 7/23/2010 5:31:52 AM

This Post:
00
152075.135 in reply to 152075.134
Date: 7/23/2010 7:52:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
Free Agents. They lower the transfer prices by adding a big percentage of availbale players on the market, AND every time a free agent is bought, al the millions disappear out of the game instead of being spread forth and forth to new clubs via transfers etc. 2 major game affections.

!zazhigai!
This Post:
00
152075.136 in reply to 152075.133
Date: 7/23/2010 7:55:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
I am doing somewhat of a tank this season, although not quite as far as Brian is suggesting. My take on this is: keep just enough of a team to finish 6th or 7th then pick up a player or two to win the relegation series, if necessary. Invest in scouting and hope for a good draft pick. Rinse and repeat for a couple of seasons, at least until you have three solid players to train.

I am still raking in $300K per week before cup income with my reduced salaries. And even though I plunked 6.2 million on an 18 year old (don't ask), I still have a bit of a cash reserve. The jury is still out on whether I will be able to stay up, but I have a 3-3 record so far, so my fingers are crossed.

I may be wrong but I think at least one team on the other side of the table is doing this, too. And I guess this strategy works better in a small country, where there is less competition.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
152075.138 in reply to 152075.133
Date: 7/23/2010 11:20:12 AM
Bisamberg Torpedos
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
5353
Second Team:
Bisamberg Torpedos II
Well maybe they think that young Trainees are just too expansive at the moment?
Paying 1-2 Millions on 18YO isn't a great decision if fully trained Players are worth 4 Millions ...

Stopping free agents from one week to the other wouldn't really help imo, it would only benefit players who didn't adapt to the changes and hurt players who did ... Imo players shouldn't be rewarded for thinking that the BBs would change it anyway if the prices go down too much so that they can sell their players for insane prices like before BBs reintroduced free agents ...

From: ned

This Post:
00
152075.139 in reply to 152075.138
Date: 7/23/2010 11:30:18 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Stopping free agents from one week to the other wouldn't really help imo...


The effect is to change suddenly the market and the economy and even if it will be better for me I'm against "external" decision; the main problem is that following the statements of the BBs the economy should be auto-regulated but how it can be autoregulated if the economy is related to: users, costs and profits, where users is a variable impossible to predict and costs and profits are dediced by someone? (salary costs 3-5% lower, TV up to 20k/week and so on...)

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
Advertisement