BuzzerBeater Forums

Bill should be right up there at number one. I dearly hope that you are single positioning him as he is one of the best rookies I've seen.

If your not please BB-Mail me.

What u think about this player;




Weekly salary: $ 6 909

DMI: 44600
Age: 19
Height: 6'1" / 185 cm
Potential: MVP
Game Shape: respectable

Jump Shot: proficient Jump Range: prominent
Outside Def.: prominent ↑ Handling: prominent
Driving: proficient Passing: average
Inside Shot: atrocious Inside Def.: atrocious
Rebounding: pitiful Shot Blocking: atrocious
Stamina: mediocre Free Throw: atrocious

Experience: pitiful

Last edited by aimar at 2/26/2010 6:50:45 AM

He looks very nice. Very well rounded. I'd say for him to have a good shot at making the U21 you should concentrate primarily on JS and OD next year. My PG was about the same level 1 higher in JS and OD, 2 Higher in PA. As I made a PG I would advise you to make him into a SG and slowly get his passing to 8. I would also try to train single position more efficiently playing him 48 minutes at the training position once a week. Great job so far!

He also needs a lot of FT remedial work. To me, I'd think he should have at least 4 or 5 FT, especially if he winds up going point guard.

Higher FT on him would be nicer, but at this point with his skill set if he wants a chance at making the U21 he needs to not waste weeks training FT or Stamina

"Very well rounded" Am I nuts? I would find a lot of descriptive phrases before I used that phrase to describe a player who had several atrocious ratings.

The atrocious ratings are not something he can control. With his height would you bother training the inside skills? No its a waste. Out of the skills he can control he has trained them balanced which will help his training, Minus Pa which is probably where it started and will catch up down the round. By saying well rounded I was referencing that he has not overlooked or over trained any of the key guard skills at such a young age.

I have to say that I feel a little disengaged from the u21 team and the process of training an u21 player.

For those of you who know me from that "other" online game HT, you'll know that I'm a huge fan of the u20 and the process of making sure that the right talent get into the right trainer's hands. Over here, I feel like there is too much ambiguity as to what it takes to take a hot prospect draftee and turn him into an u21 calibre player.

I've had two draftees that, looking back, could have been u21 type players. Unfortunately, I didn't know what made skills they needed to be the right type of player nor did I receive appropriate guidance.

In HT, it is a simple equation. Take a mainskill guy and train him in nothing but that 1 skill until he's an u21 player. Over here, there are many more skills that influence a coach's decision. I'd argue that your normal user doesn't know which skills are valued for which position and which ones are the most important to train.

Is there an opportunity, as we head into the offseason to get the NT coach and the u21 coach to post a list of which skills he values for the 5 positions to help those of us who are struggling through this game train appropriately.


Lastly, I'll ask. How are we behind anyone in the world on the NT stage? This is a US based game, right? Why aren't we the class of the world? Is it userbase? Is it training issues? Is it organization?

"The process of making sure that the right talent gets into the right trainer's hands"

I think that this is much harder here than in HT. Many of our NT calibre players go overseas and don't come back. The upper-tier teams (that have the know-how) don't seem to be training many prospects. The merchandising changes should help keep some our players here going forward. I've seen some of our U21 player bought (Leslie) by NBBA teams. Maybe other top teams will follow suit.

Getting involved with either NT or U21 is pretty easy through the forum or just showing up in chat to watch the games. Wozzvt and Coco have both proven to be open to discussing any part of the team and are very accessible.

a view from the peanut gallery:

this recent exchange has clarified some issues in my mind. the beauty of this game is the immense range of choices available to the manager; priorities are important, as is long-term planning. i made a decision some time ago to train balanced players for a balanced team; i don't know if this is the best way, i had some initial success, then ran into a brick wall, and now may be figuring out how to climb over that wall; i know this approach suits me psychologically / philosophically, so i am determined to make it work. i gather the game engine is drifting in this direction, rewarding such players / teams; i am unsure, but even if true, i am sure it would be closer to a tweak than a major change in direction.

one consequence of all this is that i don't see how i could be in a position to train a player for the U21 team. i took one look at that player profiled a few posts previously, and saw nothing but holes that my league opponents could exploit. my training process means i could take an 18 year old (i favor 19 year olds for better value -- sort of like buying a one-year old used car) and work on him, but he will not be in a position to even start for me until he is 21 or 22; i think it is a rapid development if he is getting playing time by 20. this is for division play. i am trying to develop an entire squad; the training necessary to develop a player to extraordinary levels before 21 i simply will not do. it is possible, i am suggesting, many other managers may be thinking along these lines.

that said, in two-three seasons i hope to have the type of squad i feel confident about, and will then begin to train single players, hoping to get a routine going of intensely focusing on one player a year. even then, the idea of trying to make a player with atrocious FT skills work just rubs me the wrong way. nevertheless, the game rewards, in various ways, the development of such players, but i want those guys standing on the shoulders of balanced players.