BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > 3 changes I'd love to see

3 changes I'd love to see

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
152135.13 in reply to 152135.9
Date: 8/4/2010 6:27:44 PM
Arizona Cacti
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
276276
I love the idea of the 5th place team switching from the Big 8 to the Great 8 and vice versa. Also, why is it that blocked shots result in a new shot clock if the shooting team gets the rebound? If a team has their shot blocked and gets the offensive rebound, the shot clock should not be reset.

This Post:
00
152135.14 in reply to 152135.1
Date: 8/9/2010 7:45:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
I like it all except number 5, even though I get on almost every day, other managers might be having difficulties with their computer or the internet. So I think it is fine the way it is.

This Post:
00
152135.15 in reply to 152135.14
Date: 8/12/2010 5:15:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
204204
I agree somehow with point 1 that, strength differs on both sides of the league, and that something could be done to make that better.

I just thought about those relegation play-offs and it seems to me that it might also be an idea to place the team which wins the relegation play-off between the number 6 of the might - and the number 7 of the strength, automatically on the place of the number 6 of the might. Of course this should also be so in the match between the number 6 of the strength and the number 7 of the might.

Short said
Nr. 6 Might - Nr. 7 Strength - winner will take place Nr. 6 Might, other team still relegates
Nr. 7 Might - Nr. 6 Strength - winner will take place Nr. 6 Strength, other team still relegates

This way strength differences between both sides will even a bit. And both sides will always get 2 new teams.

However with point 2, I really disagree. That's what makes BB challenging!

edit: And offcourse if the number 5 spot could get less hated, I'd like that too!

Last edited by Arsjitekt at 8/12/2010 5:16:10 PM