BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > National Cup Seedings

National Cup Seedings

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
152188.13 in reply to 152188.12
Date: 7/20/2010 10:54:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
The FA cup is unseeded, but the better teams don't enter until later rounds.

This Post:
00
152188.14 in reply to 152188.12
Date: 7/20/2010 10:54:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
How about the FA Cup?

The draw

The draw for each round is not seeded and is broadcast live on television, usually taking place at the conclusion of live coverage of one of the games of the previous round.




"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
152188.15 in reply to 152188.14
Date: 7/20/2010 11:06:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
As chris902 said, the better teams don't enter the cup until the later rounds. That is the same, or at least very similar to seeding.

This Post:
00
152188.16 in reply to 152188.15
Date: 7/20/2010 11:07:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
As chris902 said, the better teams don't enter the cup until the later rounds. That is the same, or at least very similar to seeding.

No it isn't.

This Post:
00
152188.17 in reply to 152188.15
Date: 7/20/2010 11:10:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
So why are many real-life cups seeded? Is it to better determine the winner? Or to maximize the entertainment value for the spectators? Or even to maximize revenue for the entire competition?

I think it's probably a combination of the last two (overlapping) constraints in the real world. Do those matter as much in BB? I tend to agree that the first constraint is being met reasonably well in BB.

Last edited by Mod-oeuftete at 7/20/2010 11:11:09 AM

This Post:
00
152188.18 in reply to 152188.16
Date: 7/20/2010 11:44:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
How is it not similar to seeding? It lets top teams advance to a certain stage so they begin there rather than at the beginning. The purpose would be similar to the purpose behind seeding.

This Post:
00
152188.19 in reply to 152188.17
Date: 7/20/2010 11:47:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
While the best team might win the cup. The second best team often won't be in the final. And the third and fourth best teams won't be in the semi final. I just don't think it is fair that you can get a really easy run through the cup for 3 or 4 rounds by playing bots and inactive human teams and consequently boost your country ranking and receive an easy 50k a week when much better teams might go out in the first round because they draw the best team in the country.

This Post:
00
152188.20 in reply to 152188.19
Date: 7/20/2010 11:52:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
293293
That may be true, but that wouldn't necessarily change with seeding. Look at this year's NCAA tournament - only one number 1 seed made it to the final weekend. Kansas didn't make it to the Sweet Sixteen. Kentucky and Syracuse went down soon after that. The Final Four was 1 vs. 2 and 5 vs. 5, with the title game as 1 vs. 5.

This Post:
00
152188.21 in reply to 152188.20
Date: 7/20/2010 11:57:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Yes, but it would certainly increase the chance of better teams making it further. It would also encourage teams to do well in their league and not tank games because as you get a higher ranking you will play an easier team in the cup.

This Post:
00
152188.22 in reply to 152188.21
Date: 7/20/2010 2:51:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
I think you can make arguments for both a seeded and a random draw in the tournament. Because you prefer the seeded version, doesn't make the random version less fair. In fact, some might argue that its more fair...everybody has the same chance of facing the top teams (everybody is treated equally).


This Post:
00
152188.23 in reply to 152188.22
Date: 7/21/2010 3:24:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
I'd prefer if the cup was seeded, but I think the weaker team should be granted HCA.

Advertisement