BuzzerBeater Forums

giving more money 2 old teams will help new teams how?

bad idea

but the idea 2 give new teams 1 month supporter or even 2 weeks is much better

i also think ALL new teams should be given a starting player they can create like there is in another game ballers united i think it is

he would be 18 allstar or perennial allstar potential, you can name him & choose a position & he would have $3.5k-$4k salary & a suitable height 4 his position

player like that is probably worth $50k on the tl but would be piceless for a new team 2 connect them 2 the game & make them want 2 stay

more money comes into the game and we can have more changes

Original developers and owners of full code don't have time to deal with BB anymore.
The only one who is working is Marin, who can't make such vast changes.

So, the question is: even with more money, who can make the changes?

Why should I go easy? You just confirmed my explanation with different words. BB masters come to check (so they can't do anything complex like altering the code) and marin got only one set of hands (so he can't do it either). So what's your point other than confirming what I'm saying? If you wanted to "calm me down", you sure failed...

No offense intended of course, but I'm just angry a bit here or there.

Last edited by Koperboy at 8/2/2012 4:15:58 AM

who is the 2nd?

I read the news (I also have to translate it), so I know the other one is someone who is not involved in the code even half the amount Marin is.
Yes, this has been said before. But the news didn't feel like saying "from now on, you will receive nothing other than some statistics because we don't have time to do aynthing else, so the game won't progress one bit over its' lifespan".

Pleas enlighten me on what harm may come to the game if more money was put into it cause I fail to see that.

The way I see the current state of the game, it doesn't matter if there are 2.000 or 20.000 supporters. Since developers are not present, I fail to see how more money would change anything other than developer's bank account. Maybe I'm wrong and such difference in income would make developers think they should invest more time into the game to make even more. But first they have to invest to get something back from community, and not the other way around. It's same as if a mediocre sports team send a message to its' fans, saying "If you will start coming to games in masses, we will be able to build a better team and win more!", while the opposite is true: First someone must invest in such team and win some games to draw interest from folks.

True, but that's just a temporary boost. This game is hard to grasp for newcomers and a lot of them are afraid of the steep learning curve and the the time needed to get out of D.III or D.II in some countries. That's why the game should be evolving - to keep around those people that care about the game.

Take a look at our country, for example: before some major advertising, we reached 700 users. With said advertising our "population" went from 700 to 1.100, which was 4 seasons ago. And now? 571. So not only we lost all the newcomers, but some older managers as well.

Last edited by Koperboy at 8/2/2012 8:30:48 AM