BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Draft

Draft

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
646.13 in reply to 646.12
Date: 8/9/2007 5:31:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616

so basically all scouting activity stops when players are shown?
sounds ok with me



if that's the idea, then I agree also.

But then we will have less 3 weeks to scout. What will be the maximum number of times we will be able to scout players through the whole season (what ever it is now - 8)? how will that affect the way the information is shown?

This Post:
00
646.14 in reply to 646.13
Date: 8/9/2007 5:43:22 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
no the idea is that you just shifting the scouting cycle.. so scouting will continue for the last 3 weeks of the season.. but it will go towards next season rather than the current one.

the totaly scouting time would stay the same.

From: raonne
This Post:
00
646.15 in reply to 646.14
Date: 8/9/2007 5:50:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
ah ok.

so it just means that we won't be able to change the amount invested for the last 3 weeks. correct?

that sounds great.

This Post:
00
646.16 in reply to 646.15
Date: 8/9/2007 5:53:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
What I think he is saying is that the money invested for the last three weeks will be counted towards the draft for the season AFTER the current one.

For instance, any money invested in the last three weeks of Season 2 would be applied to the scouting for the draft following the conclusion of Season 3.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
646.17 in reply to 646.16
Date: 8/9/2007 6:06:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
ok, I see. That sounds good also.

But what about this season, we will simply have 3 less weeks of scouting, or something different will be done?

This Post:
00
646.18 in reply to 646.17
Date: 8/9/2007 3:15:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
That I do not know, and a BB would be better served answering that.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
646.19 in reply to 646.18
Date: 8/9/2007 5:13:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
You have probably made your minds, most probably my idea isn't so easy to apply, and I am new to the community so my idea won't be heard, but I will post it anyway. As Edge magazine claimed with their previous cover "Who dares, wins!". :D

Well, enough with my silly humour. What I suggest is this:

Countries divided into regions. Teams sending their scouts to specific regions. The more time you invest in one region, the most possible it is to find the better players from that region. Players info appear from the first week of the scouting, but as time passes and more scouting is done, the stats begin to differ and in the end they are more accurate than from the beggining. (Like, my scouter finds a youngie power forward and gets surprised by his blocking skill in the first day, so he rates him with a 10. But then, in the second day, that guy doesn't even block a dwarf, so my scouter changes his 10 and gives him a 0. In the third day, that guy makes 2-3 blocks and my scout changes again, giving him a 4)

[We could expand it a bit, by giving teams the option to have more than one scouter and by giving scouters specialities. Like Scouter A specializing in centers, Scouter B in small forwards, etc. But that's just an extra idea]

So, if for example there is a total of 8 weeks for scouting, our reports would be half accurate if we have only scouted for 4 weeks, more accurate if we have scouted 6, and so on. That way, everybody gets what he paid for.

Hope you understand me, my english suck sometimes. :)