BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The Most Expensive BB Players (Top 10)

The Most Expensive BB Players (Top 10)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
78289.133 in reply to 78289.131
Date: 5/14/2009 12:35:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I have a level 6 PR guy and he brings in substantially more than the level 10 guy I had before the staff change. The substantial difference would just about cover one day of a 150k/week salary, so there is a way to go before PR managers are going to help pay for Frankenballers.

Last edited by somdetsfinest at 5/14/2009 12:38:29 AM

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
78289.134 in reply to 78289.108
Date: 5/14/2009 1:28:46 AM
AS Barroom Heroes
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
10201020
Second Team:
Lone Pine Productions
No, they are indeed frankenballer - overtrained, useless freaks who will not fit into a star-studded franchise.

I know you won't agree with me - you appear to think players have some god-given right to be triple 18-skilled, whereas triple 14 not only makes much more sense, it allows players to emphasise one skill or another (at a defined cost) and give meaning to the levels about wondrous.

I absolutely love it that every training slot of every week has consequences, and you can't develop one player at the expense of your franchise, unless you effectively have quit the game in favour of NT 'glory'.

perhaps the anti-farmers should set up the NT-Player Police and use the anti-cheating forms ;-)

Hahaha...you've gotta be kidding me. You really think Fanesi is useless? Are you serious? Can you give me a rational explanation why, aside from his salary (which is the problem we are discussing), he isn't better than a triple 14? Try playing a triple 14 against him in a man-to-man defense and then we'll see if you still feel the same way.

This Post:
00
78289.135 in reply to 78289.128
Date: 5/14/2009 1:33:09 AM
AS Barroom Heroes
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
10201020
Second Team:
Lone Pine Productions
Sorry to reply to this after so many other posts went by. I seem to be online when most people are asleep and then log off just as the masses are getting on board.

I do see what you are saying but I disagree. Players are nothing more than the sum of the actions taken by their managers in training. I don't think that a player who has an unaffordable salary is the best player in the game. You have to weigh costs and benefits in this game. Up til now most managers have been blindly training single position with emphasis only on primary skills without looking down the road three seasons and seeing that their Frankenballers were going to have ridiculous and unaffordable salaries. Why is that a problem? It is a problem for the managers who trained those freaks and for the idjits who pay to have them on their team. It is no problem for managers who have spread their training around to create more balanced players who perform at a level of, say, 13-15. I think this trend for creating triple 18+ is not only overly testosteronic but obviously stupid financially. If a manager couldn't see that they were creating an unusable player, maybe next time they will open their eyes. Those players whose salaries make them unplayable will retire. So what? There will be hundreds more shortly. And maybe they will be more all-around, but I doubt it.

Now, to look at your problem from another angle- Perhaps a change in ticket pricing, tv revenue, or some other merchandising outlet can be introduced to increase the amount of cash teams are pulling in. 35k/week seems a bit low for tv revenue in the 21st century.

I think you have to distinguish between players. There are ones that have been trained horribly that are indeed almost useless, even though they have a huge salary, and there are those, like Fanesi or the Latvian dude, who are just fantastic players, aside from their salary. When I say "best player" I am referring to their skills, and not considering their salary, which, like I said in my previous post, is exactly the problem. The paradox we are reaching is that the best players in the game will be the most harmful to their teams. That really makes no sense at all, and is an indication that perhaps the salary growth, which is obviously exponential, is not calibrated correctly.
And I agree with your last paragraph 100%.

This Post:
00
78289.136 in reply to 78289.135
Date: 5/14/2009 1:38:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
It would be comforting to be able to insure your players against inj. maybe 5/10% of the salary per week. At least you could then invest with a bit more confidence and this could help stabilise transfer prices.

From: kaprons
This Post:
00
78289.137 in reply to 78289.136
Date: 5/14/2009 2:35:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
i totally disagree that these players are freaks, especially if other skills are not too low. players like Ikstens are really great (except for salary at the moment), and there are many teams with a lot of millions in their "banks" that can pay for these salaries for a long time. and you could afford players like Ikstens easily if you know how to train and sell right players.

and people think about their National Teams too :)

Last edited by kaprons at 5/14/2009 2:36:26 AM

This Post:
00
78289.138 in reply to 78289.135
Date: 5/14/2009 2:37:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Okay. I see your point. In many cases of high salary guys on the TL I see the "almost useless" and rarely do I see the Latvian or Fanesi. Maybe the salary formula should be recalibrated so that values above 15 increase not to the power of the skill level but 15+some decimal value. For example 16 would be skill modifier to the 15.2 power. 17 would be skill modifier to the 15.4 power etc. That might bring salaries down.

Also best players being most harmful to their teams- see Terrell Owens, Lawrence Phillips, Stephon Marbury, Latrell Sprewell, etc... Different circumstances obviously (and a foray into real world vs BB world which we all know is a bit silly) but it is difficult to build coach-choking into the training engine so they make it purely financial...


Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
78289.139 in reply to 78289.136
Date: 5/14/2009 2:42:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
That is a fantastic idea. I would also like to be able to pay a "no-foul" insurance, a "no-missed shot" insurance and a "no turnover" insurance.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
78289.140 in reply to 78289.139
Date: 5/14/2009 3:00:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
That is a fantastic idea. I would also like to be able to pay a "no-foul" insurance, a "no-missed shot" insurance and a "no turnover" insurance.


chortle chortle....

So you dont think that major sports teams have insurance against players picking up injuries? or is this because you are yet to have a player worth insuring?

This Post:
00
78289.141 in reply to 78289.140
Date: 5/14/2009 3:25:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Certainly the latter. My boys are too tough for insurance. They routinely dig drainage ditches with their teeth and engage in ki-otoshi.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
78289.142 in reply to 78289.141
Date: 5/14/2009 3:39:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
can I recommend teaching your boys the haimen zuke... when my boys are on the road in dodgy parts of the US this comes in useful so they can make it from the team bus to the court!

This Post:
00
78289.143 in reply to 78289.134
Date: 5/14/2009 7:52:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
387387
obviously (I'd have thought) I mean useless in being part of a successful franchise. Perhaps you can win BBB with one 200k salary player and seven others on 50k each, but I doubt it.
B

Advertisement