BuzzerBeater Forums

*yawn*

Clearly, it's impossible to compete with a high salary LI team with an outside offense unless you have NT-level defense. I mean, look at:
(59082488)

This is an unfair example of LI dominance, since the road team started three bigs at SF, PF and C with more combined salary than the entire home team's roster. Look at how those 100k+ big men tear apart the sub-25k salary players they're going against... wait, what? The outside team won?

SB drove up the salary of a big man as much as a primary skills,but is not necessary as a primary skill.
Look at the salaries say little about the strength of a team

*yawn*

Clearly, it's impossible to compete with a high salary LI team with an outside offense unless you have NT-level defense. I mean, look at:
(59082488)

This is an unfair example of LI dominance, since the road team started three bigs at SF, PF and C with more combined salary than the entire home team's roster. Look at how those 100k+ big men tear apart the sub-25k salary players they're going against... wait, what? The outside team won?

Just playing devil's advocate with this example.

Home vs Road. 6 players vs a deep bench, 3 of his starters playing the entire game. We can't see stamina, gameshape or enthusiasm for last week to know how they effected the outcome either.

Not exactly a huge surprise in my eyes that you won this game and even then, it was close.

LMFAO

I'm thankful for such a comprehensive argumentation of your thoughts on my statement. You must be very mature and experienced.

My answer is more sensible than your statements.Everyone who has played at half-decent level in BB can see the difference between having a 10 and a 12 ID on their big mans

SB drove up the salary of a big man as much as a primary skills,but is not necessary as a primary skill.
Look at the salaries say little about the strength of a team

SB itself is not expensive - it costs less than the other three inside skills. Where it hurts is that when you look at a 15-15-15-5 build and raise SB to 15 the cost skyrockets, and since so few people ever even consider cutting out IS, ID or RB, the myth persists.

So it's not a myth,it's a matter of fact that SB is too expensive for what brings to a player and for what you got to pay in the general scheme of the economy of a team

LMFAO

I'm thankful for such a comprehensive argumentation of your thoughts on my statement. You must be very mature and experienced.

My answer is more sensible than your statements.Everyone who has played at half-decent level in BB can see the difference between having a 10 and a 12 ID on their big mans

If you have all the answers on what works and what doesn't, why are you still in D3 20 seasons into your BB career?

Of course higher ID is better, that's not the point. What people are discussiing here is how to build players differently under a cost effective model. We're discussing at what point training more ID becomes ineffective in terms of bang for your buck.

There are a lot of experienced manager in Italy,and I can't claim to be better than all of them for sure...and no one of them would say that there is no difference between 10 ID and 12 ID

There are a lot of experienced manager in Italy,and I can't claim to be better than all of them for sure...and no one of them would say that there is no difference between 10 ID and 12 ID

The poster your responded too didn't say there was no difference between 10 and 12. Try reading his statement again.

There are a lot of experienced manager in Italy,and I can't claim to be better than all of them for sure...and no one of them would say that there is no difference between 10 ID and 12 ID

The poster your responded too didn't say there was no difference between 10 and 12. Try reading his statement again.

But it can't exist any debatement about how building a player that is cost effective that sees a reduction of ID to such a low level
Defenses are good to train to high level in any cost efficiency model