BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Few none-changing-Game-Engine Suggestions

Few none-changing-Game-Engine Suggestions

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
156626.14 in reply to 156626.13
Date: 9/12/2010 8:41:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
I think so as well. With DMI in combination would any mathematic nerd figure out something like that easily. But I think this can be avioded by that - player would announce to you the increase only once per season before playoff... so you have time to prepare for that, but will not figure out from that anything else.

Last edited by aigidios at 9/12/2010 8:42:26 AM

This Post:
00
156626.15 in reply to 156626.14
Date: 9/12/2010 8:53:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I think so as well. With DMI in combination would any mathematic nerd figure out something like that easily. But I think this can be avioded by that - player would announce to you the increase only once per season before playoff... so you have time to prepare for that, but will not figure out from that anything else.


and why this didn't happen till now :) There are so many different "unknown" variables in it that it will ever be a guess.

But i am against showing the subskills and don't think that the salary staff work with the dynamik salary system.

From: Jadoo

This Post:
00
156626.16 in reply to 156626.15
Date: 9/12/2010 9:49:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2626
unfortunately without a major facelift this game will not be able to retain new players and thus expanding ... its nearly impossible and scientifically impossible as well to get everybody .. BB's should make decisions and fast.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
11
156626.17 in reply to 156626.16
Date: 9/12/2010 9:57:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
unfortunately without a major facelift this game will not be able to retain new players and thus expanding ... its nearly impossible and scientifically impossible as well to get everybody .. BB's should make decisions and fast.


and you should give me the scientific studys you make :) A change just for the will of change is never good.

And maing skillups boring is for me not animprovement of the game, because i easily could predict the training, and i dont have to test anything more with the training.

This Post:
00
156626.18 in reply to 156626.16
Date: 9/12/2010 10:10:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
I'm not entirely sure what you are saying here regarding "scientific impossibilities" and such. Anyway, the BB's are constantly improving the game. Considering the size of the BB team and the fact that they need to bring new people in, we should not expect any disruptive changes but a process of mostly incremental improvement for the time being. I think the recent changes (such as the new scouting/draft system) affect both the core game experience and the community in very positive ways. I don't know if there are any "facelift" plans (which I guess mostly means how the site looks and feels, right?), but some future improvements including updates to the game engine have been communicated earlier. Please take a look at the past news postings if you haven't seen them yet.

From: Jadoo

This Post:
00
156626.19 in reply to 156626.17
Date: 9/12/2010 10:21:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2626
unfortunately without a major facelift this game will not be able to retain new players and thus expanding ... its nearly impossible and scientifically impossible as well to get everybody .. BB's should make decisions and fast.


and you should give me the scientific studys you make :) A change just for the will of change is never good.

And maing skillups boring is for me not animprovement of the game, because i easily could predict the training, and i dont have to test anything more with the training.


It is scientifically proven that u cant get everybody on this forum to agree all at the same time on one thing .. Probability in high school my friend!
Second thing, ur a GM and have been playing this game for too long you know the ins and outs whereas new joiners dont!

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
156626.20 in reply to 156626.19
Date: 9/12/2010 10:25:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
and maybe you should consider that i play the game so long because it was fun and like the oppurtunity for new joiners to have the same fun?

Understand everything is for me more a reason to quit, then just understand just the rough basics - because i like to learn and i like the excitement of a surprise.



Last edited by CrazyEye at 9/12/2010 10:26:53 AM

This Post:
00
156626.21 in reply to 156626.18
Date: 9/12/2010 10:38:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2626
the title is none-changing-game-engine changes.
The only one which might change how the GE works is the training method and as I have mentioned at the beginning of the thread I dont feel strongly about it but just a thought.
Yes this game needs face lift and not all of us will agree on what and how (and that is scientific impossibilities to get 1000+ people to agree on one thing).

From: Jadoo

This Post:
00
156626.22 in reply to 156626.20
Date: 9/12/2010 10:42:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2626
and maybe you should consider that i play the game so long because it was fun and like the oppurtunity for new joiners to have the same fun?



What's fun for you might not be fun for someone else, and what might be fun for me might not be fun for X Y and Z.
you can't get everybody to like something just because you like it. Or else, the BB's wouldnt have introduced the Suggestion forum.
For me I like the game and you wont see me quitting anytime soon. But I realized and noticed and know a lot of people who have signed up and never signed up again. Well I dont have the numbers of course, but just from observation. Just go to the lower leagues and check how many drop outs rather than joiners.. and check also those joiners, how many of them actually did not sign in again.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
156626.23 in reply to 156626.21
Date: 9/12/2010 10:45:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Yes this game needs face lift and not all of us will agree on what and how (and that is scientific impossibilities to get 1000+ people to agree on one thing).


but to implentchange just because of implenting changes ain't good for a game, thats like playing with an small kid who always change the rules during a game ;)

And probadly you don't get an 100% consens in a possible change, but you should forward to improve the acceptance of a feature through a change. So changing a system what 80% of the users like, to a system was 60% of the users like isn't an improvement in my eyes.

From: Jadoo

This Post:
00
156626.24 in reply to 156626.23
Date: 9/12/2010 10:48:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2626
if that is the case you are absolutely right, but im sure many will agree with at least 5 of my 7 suggestions. (the other 2 being the training ones which up to a lot of debate and i wud debate against them as much as with them).

Advertisement