BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Modify how injuries occur

Modify how injuries occur

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
194523.14 in reply to 194523.11
Date: 8/22/2011 9:04:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
It's usually a shooting foul, that creates the injury (although it half of the time is shooting + flagrant). I think I've seen about 50% of injuries happen from flagrant fouls. I think I have seen atleast one regular foul injury (not shooting, not fragrant), I might be wrong though.

This Post:
00
194523.15 in reply to 194523.14
Date: 8/22/2011 9:59:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
Let's just abolish injuries, they are the only aspect of this game that really sucks big time.

This Post:
00
194523.16 in reply to 194523.14
Date: 8/22/2011 9:59:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
Yes correct, at the moment its shooting foul + flagrant foul combo. I have never seen a non-shooting non-flagrant foul occur ever.

We are suggesting that injuries should be caused by other factors - Scrimmage for the ball, rebound, player defending a strong driving opposition, etc etc etc.


This Post:
22
194523.17 in reply to 194523.16
Date: 8/22/2011 10:11:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
Building from scratch that perfect SF you always wanted: 9 seasons

Buying out of the TL a world-class PG: 4 millions

Having those 2 players injuried just before your national league playoff finals: sucks big time






This Post:
00
194523.18 in reply to 194523.16
Date: 8/22/2011 11:14:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
Yes correct, at the moment its shooting foul + flagrant foul combo. I have never seen a non-shooting non-flagrant foul occur ever.

We are suggesting that injuries should be caused by other factors - Scrimmage for the ball, rebound, player defending a strong driving opposition, etc etc etc.



(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/36168099/reportmatch.as...)

Non-shooting, non-flagrant foul leading to injury. Although now that I'm looking at it, I'm not sure why my team (the one that fouled) got the ball after the foul and substitutions.

This Post:
00
194523.19 in reply to 194523.18
Date: 8/22/2011 8:28:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
its still a foul. might not have been flagrant and might not have been shooting, but its still a foul.

and as i said, I personally have never seen one of these. but ive seen plenty of shooting-flagrant foul combo's as most people would agree, so if there is the existence of non-flagrant foul -injuries, then their occurance is so minimal that Im suggesting it should be changed to be more frequent, and reduce the frequency of foul-related injuries.



This Post:
00
194523.20 in reply to 194523.19
Date: 8/22/2011 9:14:37 PM
New York Chunks
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
943943
I think most of my injuries occur from regular shooting fouls, not flagrant fouls. Just my unscientific observation.

Don't ask what sort of Chunks they are, you probably don't want to know. Blowing Chunks since Season 4!
Advertisement