BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > New engine bug/s

New engine bug/s

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
20276.15 in reply to 20276.14
Date: 3/22/2008 5:48:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
thanks for the prompt response.

One more thing if I may :)
The team ahead should as well try to give (and keep) the ball in the hands of his best FT shooter... is this already happening? It did not look like it in my game...

This Post:
00
20276.16 in reply to 20276.15
Date: 3/22/2008 6:05:26 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
the team ahead gets the ball into the hands of its gaurds, the team behind tries to get it into the hands of a poor FT shooter. the team ahead tries to put its best FT shooting team in (well a compromise between starters>best players> and best FT shooters)

This Post:
00
20276.17 in reply to 20276.16
Date: 3/23/2008 10:53:24 AM
Ffeppola
IV.23
Overall Posts Rated:
934934
Second Team:
Utah Jaff
(http://www.buzzerbeater.org/BBWeb/reportmatch.aspx?matchi...)

In the fourth quarter my team is loosing 102-105 the last action is like this.

0:01 - Jill Ramsyer ends the possession with a defensive rebound.
0:01 - 30 second timeout called by Ffeppola (my team).

At this point I thought my team would try to tie the game with a 3 point shot. But the game continues like this.

0:00 - Jill Ramsyer collects the rebound and goes back up for the shot, guarded closely by Stefano Piovani.
0:00 - Scored.
0:00 - End of period.

It seems that the defensive rebound before the timeout has magically become an offensive rebound, forcing the player to take a 2 point shot (so that I lost by 1 point, aaaargh!). Maybe it's some kind of bug?

This Post:
00
20276.18 in reply to 20276.17
Date: 3/23/2008 12:02:17 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
huh something clearly wrong...

will look into it. if anyone else sees something similar please let us know.. the more examples the easier it is to find the bug.

This Post:
00
20276.19 in reply to 20276.18
Date: 3/23/2008 5:29:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
Concerning forfeits... what is wrong with this game?
(2516146)

This Post:
00
20276.20 in reply to 20276.19
Date: 3/23/2008 5:34:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Nothing? It's been forfeited, has been played with lucky fans to get minutes for training, and 25-0 has been assigned as the final score. That's the way it's supposed to work, no?

edit: Except there are no minutes assigned to the non-walkover team, heh. Representational bug?

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 3/23/2008 5:35:06 PM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
20276.21 in reply to 20276.20
Date: 3/23/2008 5:49:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
edit: Except there are no minutes assigned to the non-walkover team, heh. Representational bug?

that is what I was pointing out :)
But it is not a representational bug because even in the players page they appear to have played 0.6 or 0.2 minutes...
In the match viewer there are all statistics correctly though.

This Post:
00
20276.22 in reply to 20276.21
Date: 3/23/2008 5:52:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
edit: Except there are no minutes assigned to the non-walkover team, heh. Representational bug?

that is what I was pointing out
But it is not a representational bug because even in the players page they appear to have played 0.6 or 0.2 minutes...
In the match viewer there are all statistics correctly though.

Yup, noticed that too. I imagine something sneaked past in the development process...

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
20276.23 in reply to 20276.22
Date: 3/23/2008 6:20:12 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
yeah... i admit we didn't test the forfeit code that carefully... and somebody.. (cough * charles* cough) called the column name 'minutes' when he actually meant seconds... all the data is there.. we are fixing the minutes played right now for those games and i've already fixed it in the future.

all fixed now i think


Last edited by BB-Forrest at 3/23/2008 6:29:56 PM

This Post:
00
20276.24 in reply to 20276.23
Date: 3/23/2008 11:33:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
yeah... i admit we didn't test the forfeit code that carefully... and somebody.. (cough * charles* cough) called the column name 'minutes' when he actually meant seconds... all the data is there.. we are fixing the minutes played right now for those games and i've already fixed it in the future.

all fixed now i think

There is an interesting thing that occurs with this particular player who took part in the forfeit:

Salvatore Andreano (4208784)

Note that even though he hasn't played in any other game, he has an average season rating of 3. Which is extremely bogus, since he shouldn't even get rating from this game, in which he played 2 minutes...

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Advertisement