BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The BB Training Crowd-Sourcing Project

The BB Training Crowd-Sourcing Project

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
203921.14 in reply to 203921.13
Date: 12/6/2011 1:48:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
okay. Going to check.

edit- got it thanks.

Last edited by WFUnDina at 12/6/2011 1:53:47 PM

This Post:
00
203921.15 in reply to 203921.11
Date: 12/6/2011 2:28:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
I get error-please log into the offsite - messages, even though I am logged in.

I'll reply to you personally again, but in case others are having this-- we've seen some problems like this for a couple people, where the greasemonkey script for whatever reason doesn't interact with the cookies on the database pages correctly. It's been an extremely difficult one to track down and there's no real work around right now.

edit: looks like the problem might have been a cookie-blocking add-on. So if others are having trouble and are using something like this, you might try temporarily disabling it.

Last edited by wozzvt at 12/6/2011 4:47:21 PM

From: Tesse

This Post:
00
203921.16 in reply to 203921.15
Date: 12/6/2011 3:58:40 PM
Cruesli
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
525525
Second Team:
The Milk
it looks very interesting. But can you explain this:

Pressure PG (n=17) 0.35 0.18 12.53 1.53 1.12 0.24 0.06 2.94 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.71 20.12

I'm looking at 26 yr old players. The skill in question is OD.

Yes it is a small samplesize so I understand bad estimates completely. But an increase of 12.53 shows that it's not only small sample size but also wrong input of data. Does it maybe treat the first visible pop towards for example lvl 12 as a 12 skill increase? Or am I reading something wrong?

Last edited by Tesse at 12/6/2011 3:59:09 PM

Crunchy! If you eat fast enough
Message deleted
This Post:
00
203921.18 in reply to 203921.16
Date: 12/6/2011 4:43:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
I've noticed a similar issue if you sort by "weeks per pop" rather than "skill increase per week."

The sample size is only 24yo players, and this is the result (ID in bold):
ID C (n=39) 20 33.3 33.3 6.7 0.5 3.6 20 10 0.4

It somehow assumes that a 24yo will pop in ID every half-week of training?

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
203921.19 in reply to 203921.18
Date: 12/6/2011 4:46:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
yep, sorry, scratch my previous reply. it was ignoring the minimum age on one of the sql queries, so it was comparing pops from ages 18-24 to the number of training instances from age 24-24. Should be fixed.

Thanks guys.

Last edited by wozzvt at 12/6/2011 4:47:51 PM

This Post:
00
203921.20 in reply to 203921.19
Date: 12/6/2011 5:27:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
Any plans to be able to add older training dates?

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
203921.21 in reply to 203921.20
Date: 12/6/2011 6:25:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
Thanks for setting this up. Should be an awesome resource.

One thing I did not see mentioned is if you are also planning on researching whether there is an effect training a foreign player instead of a domestic player or how big it is.

This Post:
00
203921.23 in reply to 203921.1
Date: 12/7/2011 11:05:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
This is awesome.

This Post:
00
203921.24 in reply to 203921.20
Date: 12/7/2011 11:37:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
Any plans to be able to add older training dates?

US users should continue to use the version we have up on the off-site. All the analysis is pulling from both sites, so no need to have it in both places. You'll still be able to access the analysis page(s) if your data is on the other site. The tracking functionality is exactly the same in both places.

I haven't decided about adding older data. I think it's important to have really good, high quality data, and the GM script really ensures that. As good as some people's records undoubtedly are going further back, it's MUCH harder to guarantee it.

Now, if you can convince the BB's to let the training history page for supporters go back further, we'd really be in business.


On a partially related note, I've added some code to filter untrustworthy data. It seems to be working, but if anything looks strange, let me know.

Advertisement