BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
Suggestions > Remove Injuries
Back to the Sneak Peek
Suggestions
playoff pricing
9
Free Agent Market
24
Punish day traders harder
123
Career Stats
13
Remove Injuries
102
Forfeits
54
Petition For Trading
5
Not to be prejudice
10
Reduce in a half the injured s...
26
Reactivating bottified account...
7
Ignore feature in forum
3
use the new engine in PL games
13
New Transfer System
4
Quantity of BB managers and fr...
6
Domestic Player of the Year!!!
3
Draft Picks
5
No nationality players
7
Max resell earning
25
Betting on matches
5
Top Draft Picks For Sale
11
<
>
Favorite Folders
Remove Injuries
(thread closed)
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
brian (25)
CrazyEye (2)
somdetsfinest (1)
kingK (2)
GM-Perpete (2)
Kukoc (3)
Yellow cake (3)
Fussion (1)
Bballin (1)
Manon (4)
Chekreyes (6)
Wolph (12)
Jason (1)
JON (2)
WFUnDina (2)
GM-hrudey (2)
Pini פיני (5)
Tangosz (5)
Sluuge (2)
Mix (1)
______ (NZ National Team) (1)
tough (1)
LBJisaCancer (3)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
brian
To:
Sluuge
This Post:
1
215737.14
in reply to
215737.12
Date: 5/6/2012 3:29:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576
so lets get the closest to that
fair enough, time to make all of these more real or remove for lack of realism:
tactics
training
effort
attendance
salaries
At least we have injuries.
"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Message deleted
From:
CrazyEye
To:
brian
This Post:
0
215737.16
in reply to
215737.14
Date: 5/6/2012 3:54:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959
you are right it is not all about realism, but i don't see the need to remove injurys. If you remoe such features,, which people considered in there strategy it cause more trouble then pleasure.
And talking for me, i am happy when i win against a team with a injured player and i think if you loose all your hope when loosing one player to win a game you risked this outcome in the planning stage. And "unlucky" outcomes can also happen in games, without injurys should they removed too? Would this make the game more intresting, i don't think so.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Sluuge
To:
brian
This Post:
0
215737.17
in reply to
215737.14
Date: 5/6/2012 3:56:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
144
Tactics - It's a game, how many varieties do you want the developers to make? In real a coach can anticipate the moment, this is a browser game..
Training - How is this unrealistic on your behalf? As far as a browser game goes, this is as realistic as it can get. In real people don't go like, hmm lets train, I might pop 1 skill point on it..
Effort - ????
Attendance - Pretty normal to me, when you lose fans won't show, when you win they do, almost like real people.
Salaries - Ok you wanna pay 10 million a year for 1 player, go ahead.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
brian
To:
Sluuge
This Post:
0
215737.18
in reply to
215737.17
Date: 5/6/2012 5:26:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576
That's all off topic and to avoid dragging this thread out ill just go ahead and disagree with you on everyone of those.
"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Sluuge
To:
brian
This Post:
0
215737.19
in reply to
215737.18
Date: 5/6/2012 6:32:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
144
Thats ok, thats the point of a suggestion, you dont have to agree or disagree
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
brian
To:
Wolph
This Post:
0
215737.21
in reply to
215737.20
Date: 5/8/2012 9:21:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576
It is a bit nuts.
Yep. If we're looking for randomness, it doesn't have to be through injuries. IIRC, the BB's tuned down the level of randomness in the GE at one point. That could be reversed and would provide a more even distribution of randomness than injuries.
"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Chekreyes
To:
brian
This Post:
0
215737.22
in reply to
215737.21
Date: 5/8/2012 9:59:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
926
I support this suggestion, I mean a realistic game is nice, but I just lost three seasons of planning to field the right team at the right time because two of my guards went down in the last week resulting in a one point loss in the first round of the playoffs against an outside oriented team. I don't wanna just complain because I was denied promotion, but when a team receives multiple injuries towards the end of the season it can destroy months of time put into this game which does result in a 'net loss of enjoyment'.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Tangosz
To:
Chekreyes
This Post:
1
215737.23
in reply to
215737.22
Date: 5/8/2012 10:11:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
573
That definitely stinks!! But in some ways deciding to field just 7 players implicitly accepts a significant risk of a bad outcome in the event of an injury. That's a reasonable strategic decision to make, and it seemed to serve you pretty well during the regular season (if that's how you did it). You fielded fewer players with higher average salaries, and benefited from their overall better performance. But in so doing, you chose to leave your team without an insurance policy in the event of an injury.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Chekreyes
To:
Tangosz
This Post:
0
215737.24
in reply to
215737.23
Date: 5/8/2012 10:14:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
926
I had eight players but my starting SG didn't suit up due to an existing injury. My starting PG went down in the middle of the game leaving my team with a OD crisis. I admit only having eight players on a team was risky, but I still had more injuries than any other playoff team. I'm writing it off to bad luck. Very frustrating when an injury or two happens at that point in the season.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Disable Emoticons and Images