BuzzerBeater Forums

It's a little difficult for me to catch the drift of your post so I'll try my best.

Your summary is a little off. I have a player which I want to keep but know he won't be seeing too much playing time this season, and I'm willing to bite the bullet and keep on paying his salary while he plays for a lower league team.

2. By only allowing lower division teams to loan players, your 'superior' player is not a foolproof plan. And not all of my suggestions are set in stone, just what I think it would take for such an idea to work instead of dismissing it outright. We could also set it so that the team taking on the loan player pays the full salary. You better be successful in overpowering the opposition, because your economy is going to take a hit. The bigger the player, the bigger economic hit you will take. And if you promote and that player goes back next season, good luck surviving relegation. It still takes planning.

3. You cannot see why you would loan out your player to top teams. That doesn't mean the other 50k managers in the game won't. Your elaboration is pretty vague, you lost me by the second sentence. Anyhow, there is no reason for the teams in the top league to take in loan players. I have already explained why there is a necessity to prevent top teams from taking loan players. All avenues of possible abuse have to be explored.

just what I think it would take for such an idea to work instead of dismissing it outright

just giv eme the point why you need it, and can not make this with buying and selling and that must not be different players. So why is that necessary, and will improve the game.

We could also set it so that the team taking on the loan player pays the full salar.
You better be successful in overpowering the opposition, because your economy is going to take a hit. The bigger the player, the bigger economic hit you will take.

it isn't just the salary, it is also the ability to get extra quality for free through connections. Which also generates extra money.

And is it no disadvantage to be stronger then you are for a season, even if you fall back after it ;) It is a clear advance if you don't have to do anything for it.

3. There is also no reason to loan players for medium teams.

just giv eme the point why you need it, and can not make this with buying and selling and that must not be different players. So why is that necessary, and will improve the game.

Ah, for that you will need to ask the initial poster. I am merely providing the conditions that are required for his idea to work.

this conditions are required, i think the condition should be at least some disadvatages for the borrower.