BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Season 26 Feedback Topic

Season 26 Feedback Topic (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
252782.143 in reply to 252782.133
Date: 1/3/2014 3:58:27 AM
Petrosian Club Montevideo
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
132132
well, if a guy injures in the NBA, they don't just discount their salary. the commissioner will just say "bad luck, gentleman", and will laugh all the way to the bank to collect the luxury tax.

@LA-Karangula:

overextending is not the same as "overspending". overextending relates to weekly economic flow, not the total money you have in your bank account.

This Post:
00
252782.144 in reply to 252782.142
Date: 1/3/2014 4:17:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55315531
This Post:
00
252782.145 in reply to 252782.144
Date: 1/3/2014 4:25:38 AM
Petrosian Club Montevideo
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
132132
well, Pop did it again this year and nothing happened [it wasn't against the Heat, nor was it a national TV game, conceded]. Also he said he was going to do what he thought was better for the Spurs, not the TV networks.

but still, this isn't even a slap in the hand. it was a specific event. and the Spurs actually weren't worried about tanking/losing. now, tanking goes all the way in the NBA. actually, they had to impose the Draft Lottery because of it. and let us not forget that mr. Stern is an employee of the Spurs too, not the other way around. so, actually, since you brought that event of last year, it was pretty funny to see that: your employee fines you a quarter of a mill for going about your own bizz??? hilarious!

Last edited by petrosian at 1/3/2014 4:28:29 AM

This Post:
00
252782.146 in reply to 252782.145
Date: 1/3/2014 4:29:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55315531
There's the NBA and there are all the other leagues in the world, where it just doesn't make sense to tank: no draft, no millions and billions of TV-money.

This Post:
11
252782.147 in reply to 252782.143
Date: 1/3/2014 4:36:38 AM
Maddogs-Hellas
IV.5
Overall Posts Rated:
13091309
well, if a guy injures in the NBA, they don't just discount their salary. the commissioner will just say "bad luck, gentleman", and will laugh all the way to the bank to collect the luxury tax.


True that.
But come on man, thats was a blow below the belt. Just by bringing up Stern into the mix, you had everybody reading this thread, going into panic mode and heading straight to their team's page to check their cash reserves!

This Post:
00
252782.148 in reply to 252782.147
Date: 1/3/2014 7:48:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
Did someone say Fan Survey? Why look anywhere else?

From: GM-Dyd

This Post:
00
252782.149 in reply to 252782.114
Date: 1/5/2014 2:38:46 PM
Sin City inFamous
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
709709
i have just 2 simple question.

Naturally answer should be the same for both, or better i can answering after experiment, but i try:


1)GDP has the same effect for every attack? Example: If i predict right focus and pace, both in Look Inside i obtain the same advantage if i predict right Low Post or Motion or R&G or every other attack? or they've some different balance?


2) if i use GDP for a perimetral attack and i use an internal defence (2-3) who "win"? are they the same or defence i use affects more than GDP choice?

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
252782.150 in reply to 252782.149
Date: 1/5/2014 3:53:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
1)GDP has the same effect for every attack? Example: If i predict right focus and pace, both in Look Inside i obtain the same advantage if i predict right Low Post or Motion or R&G or every other attack? or they've some different balance?

I think I can answer this question, but let someone "official" confirm if possible.

If you predict inside offense, your inside defense - and only inside defense - strengthens up. Same for outside defense. Balanced offense - probably both defenses strenghten up a bit. Not sure yet how pace guessing affects your opponent though. Maybe your defense is better during first 7-8 seconds of opponent's attack if you guess fast?

This Post:
00
252782.151 in reply to 252782.150
Date: 1/6/2014 5:54:58 AM
BG Samuraj
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
142142
Overextension Tax formula:

Total Expenses:
This week's Player Salaries
This week's Staff Salaries
This week's Scouting

Total Revenue:
Last known Attendance
Last week's Merchandise
Last week's TV Contract

This week..., Last week..., Last known and No income of National Tournament Game.

I think this is not logical.

My business last week:
Expenses: 234 888
Revenue: 458 231
Balance: 223 343

Overextension Tax: 35 826!!!!

I think there is something wrong:(

This Post:
00
252782.153 in reply to 252782.152
Date: 1/6/2014 7:33:58 AM
BG Samuraj
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
142142
My business last week:
Expenses: 234 888
Revenue: 458 231
Balance: 223 343

Overextension Tax: 35 826!!!!

I think there is something wrong:(

These are not your data right?
Can you please elaborate if you mean with this that the calculation is not right (bug) or that you don't agree with the way the tax is calculated?

These are my data.(I bought a few players last week, and salaries gone up this week)
12/30/2013 Weekly player salaries $ 213 862
12/30/2013 Weekly staff salaries $ 21 026
12/30/2013 Weekly Merchandise profit $ 37 294
12/30/2013 Weekly TV contract $ 134 215
12/31/2013 League Game (Televised) against KK Sveti Vid $ 236 722
1/2/2014 National Tournament Game against vitanovac $ 50 000

1/6/2014 Overextension Tax $ 35 826

I don't agree with the way the tax is calculated.

You're mixing data, current week (Expenses), previous week (Revenue), latest attendance(Revenue) and there is no profit from Cup.

Advertisement