BuzzerBeater Forums

That's why I gave you the comparison for the 3 key positions. 62 on average vs 169 in reality cannot be explained by normal means. It means that if they replay the same exact game another 7-8 times that player should go a combined 40 points on 87 FGA to balance things out while in this game he had 22 points with 13 FGA!

It makes no sense whatsoever: the most rational conclusion is that either the game manual is missing some key part in the definition or they made changes to the GE while this information (and the team ratings) have stayed the same and they are therefore less accurate than they used to be.

I'm not saying that you shouldn't lose with better ratings. But if you have better ratings and the opponent is also supposed to score inefficiently at the positions taking the bulk of the shots then something does not add up. Either something is missing or incorrect, but being unable to tell what was wrong is bad.

(79286586)


I have some experience in this game,but can someone tell me "OMG how come i lose this game" :D

I mean.. i have 4 players each with more salary than my oporent's whole team. And i lose it..

Both teams played with the same effort - Take it easy.

(79081873)

i like the concept "you are better in everything,but u gone lose boy".who cares if you lose money from tickets or whatever.its funny though.

Here's another example: SF shooting rating per 100 shots is 120.9. That SF scored 16 points on 23 field goal attempted (69/100). Once again if the rating BB gives us is correct, to make up for that bad shooting and for the shooting rating to make sense, it means that if you replay the same exact game another 3 times the SF would go a combined 105 points on 77 FGA. Makes no sense.

Until they change team and shooting ratings into something meaningful that we can use, we won't know exactly what's happening and why. It seems more and more likely that these ratings are based on a different Game Engine.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 2/16/2015 10:54:17 AM

Well, today I played the match, which should be a good one for this topic...
(79420445), I had almost every stat better, but I lost... a bad luck or just great 3PT shots of my opponent?

Most stats were close, except you shot 26% three's and he shot 48%, and he blocked 12 shots to your one. Home team won a close game. Is this extraordinary?

(81824070)

Any idea?