BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Playing with only 3 players must be stopped!

Playing with only 3 players must be stopped! (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
119192.15 in reply to 119192.14
Date: 11/21/2009 3:14:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
I still haven't seen anyone give a concrete reason why playing with 3 players is a travesty.
..It makes my best lineup look bad losing against only three players? ;P

Last edited by Svett Sleik (U21-Scout Norge) at 11/21/2009 3:14:36 PM

Message deleted
This Post:
00
119192.17 in reply to 119192.16
Date: 11/23/2009 5:05:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Its no way you can play ball, a full court game, a 5 vs 5 game with only 3 starters... thats a forfeit... plain N simple... thats one thing that needs to be taken out of this game...


if you come with three players to a game, you are allowed to play it ;) Important is that you care that only one player gets injured or fouled out, because it becomes a forfeit when you have less then 2 players on the court.

Last edited by Edju at 11/23/2009 5:29:11 PM

This Post:
00
119192.18 in reply to 119192.17
Date: 11/26/2009 12:37:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
+1 on the suggestion.

From what I've heard, you have to have at least 5-6 players to play a competitive league/cup/NT game... BB says that they use NBA rules and I'm not familiar with their rules...

Does NBA rules say that the minimum number of players should be at least 3? Also, if you lack players, should you get one from audiences? (Well, in scrimmage, you could play whoever you want, I have no problem with it).

If these two questions can be answered by "Yes", then, I guess we have to follow rules. Otherwise, then it's a problem that must be solved.

This Post:
00
119192.19 in reply to 119192.18
Date: 11/26/2009 1:09:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
I don't see why I should have to play with more players as if today with 3 players against 12 in Greece (17597214) I lose with 99-98 (after they hit their last 2 shots with 3-pointers), we won the rebounds 47-32.... Who cares about what happens in a scrimmage, there is no audience anyway.

!zazhigai!
This Post:
00
119192.20 in reply to 119192.19
Date: 11/26/2009 1:26:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
there is no audience anyway.


1200 watched the game you posted... those are the audience (who watched the game for free) :)

This Post:
00
119192.21 in reply to 119192.20
Date: 11/26/2009 2:10:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
there is no audience anyway.


1200 watched the game you posted... those are the audience (who watched the game for free)


yes, and two of them got even lucky!:) I believe with no-one paying, everyone was very satisfied with the happening.:)

!zazhigai!
This Post:
00
119192.22 in reply to 119192.21
Date: 11/28/2009 6:58:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
you are looking for a good reason? Let me try to give 1

It drives up TL traffic. ;)


I bought a 1000$ guy before last scrimmage, only to get 5 players on the field.

I could have just played my four, and have a lucky fan play, but I hate it that my valuable fans would get injured during play, so I decided to spend a 1000 on a player. I call it "lucky player" since otherwise he would have spend his last miserable days on the TL. Now he could end in glory, playing with others he was worshipping anyway, ending his career with a glorious win.


But I know you are right. If the BBs have chosen 3 is the number, then they either have a good reason for it, or thought it was a nice number. And unless there is some real good reason, I don't see reason to change it (read put time and effort in it).

On the other hand, if a majority of the BB-users would like a change better, that would be a real good reason. Not sure where we stand on this point thoug.


They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
From: Exos
This Post:
00
119192.23 in reply to 119192.22
Date: 11/30/2009 7:43:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I think the reason for minimum 3 players is training. The most positions you can train (aside from team training) is 3. Mayyybee

From: Unkel

To: Exos
This Post:
00
119192.24 in reply to 119192.23
Date: 11/30/2009 8:16:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
No, that's senseless and not logical, but it's a nice try anyway. 3 is just a number greater than 2 and smaller than 5. Like 4, so the logic is just that logical ...

Last edited by Unkel at 11/30/2009 8:16:25 AM

Advertisement