BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Formula for Potential Uncovered

Formula for Potential Uncovered

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
188524.15 in reply to 188524.14
Date: 07/05/2011 08:59:14
Matrix Mighty Dunkers
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
10011001
Hi Josef

can u tell me what is the diffrence between historical and hall of famer potential?

regards

Last edited by aMORFIczny at 07/05/2011 08:59:50

This Post:
00
188524.17 in reply to 188524.16
Date: 07/05/2011 09:53:03
Overall Posts Rated:
6868
Once you work this out are you going to modify the coachparrot scout page to allow for potential cap?

This Post:
11
188524.19 in reply to 188524.18
Date: 07/05/2011 12:51:52
Overall Posts Rated:
6868
By the way, how much slower is the training of capped players really, what is everybody's estimate? Mine is a factor of 3, basically just guessing.


my 23 yo allstar SG i trained and then sold last season went from popping every 3 weeks in JS to 9 weeks for the next pop, so I'd say a factor of 3 is right. he was well balanced and capped around 45k.

This Post:
44
188524.21 in reply to 188524.20
Date: 07/07/2011 11:47:32
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
I have base of ~1000 polish players (but I don't know who is capped and who not).
But I'll try to test these formulas on this base to seek something interesting.

More legible version of coefficients table:


     JS   JR   OD   HA   DR   PA   IS   ID   RB   SB

PG  ,15  ,28  ,29  ,23  ,13  ,50  ,07  ,01  ,25  ,04
SG  ,46  ,47  ,40  ,07  ,00  ,07  ,07  ,08  ,28  ,04
SF  ,64  ,22  ,30  ,07  ,00  ,04  ,08  ,25  ,32  ,04
PF  ,40  ,02  ,00  ,07  ,00  ,04  ,40  ,40  ,38  ,20
C   ,00  ,17  ,00  ,03  ,00  ,04  ,49  ,41  ,45  ,24


Last edited by B.B.King at 07/07/2011 11:49:13

This Post:
00
188524.23 in reply to 188524.20
Date: 07/07/2011 14:55:24
Overall Posts Rated:
204204
there are some really interesting things in there. JR for Cs is quite surprising, in particular when comparing to JR for PFs. PGs are the only ones whose driving affects the potential. OD is roughly as important for SFs as for PGs. Passing for PGs and Jump Shooting for SFs are responsible for more than 25% of the potential... and quite a bit more.

This Post:
11
188524.25 in reply to 188524.24
Date: 07/07/2011 15:24:16
Overall Posts Rated:
204204
kudos for all that work, nevertheless.

and while I pretty much expected JS to be important for PFs, neither did I think it could be irrelevant for Cs - nor more relevant for PFs than for PGs.

Of course, this opens the field very wide for an attempt to maximise a player under potential and salary perspectives - basically, how far can I train any player, given his potential, so that I get the highest skill sum/the lowest salary out of him. Pandora's BB Box.

Advertisement