BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > More Staff

More Staff

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
19254.15 in reply to 19254.13
Date: 03/15/2008 13:03:36
Overall Posts Rated:
9898
It'd be a performance advantage for the rich clubs, but it would be that much less money invested in players. Also, it could be a quick fix for smaller clubs that aren't wanting to invest huge amounts yet in a player or in stadium improvement to move up a notch. Besides, it's a management game--building a big bank acct is half the challenge.

This Post:
00
19254.16 in reply to 19254.15
Date: 03/15/2008 13:11:12
Overall Posts Rated:
22
that means everything should to depend on money in this game?

You want to invest your money and boost your team's performance, shouldn't be this game more like sport/tactic game? Investing of a money is a very simple step, doesn't depend on your abilities at all.

This Post:
00
19254.17 in reply to 19254.16
Date: 03/15/2008 13:16:04
Overall Posts Rated:
9898
Not sure how you went from half to everything, but management of money is certainly a part of any management game and is tied to the training scheme. That's what gets people to keep playing. In my view setting the tactics is the easiest part of this game.

This Post:
00
19254.18 in reply to 19254.17
Date: 03/15/2008 13:24:14
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Is pointless to compare what is most easy in this game - the point is that according this idea will have rich clubs another advantage to boost theirs performace.

Few staff members+ couldn't be bad, but more influence these staffs will have to the performance of your team, more advantage you'll get just for the money..

I think this is a bad, you don't think so, thats it

This Post:
00
19254.19 in reply to 19254.18
Date: 03/19/2008 21:20:47
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I am neutral about this idea, but I don't think it will be implemented because it will just make it harder to climb the league pyramid.