BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Overextention tax

Overextention tax

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Fresh24
This Post:
00
252784.15 in reply to 252784.13
Date: 12/28/2013 12:01:21 AM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
With that table, it seems to me like the tax rate would go up the more overextension tax you spend. Anyone willing to test out the rates? :)

This Post:
00
252784.16 in reply to 252784.14
Date: 12/28/2013 12:06:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
you purchase a trainee with 10k salary, 2 seasons of training later he is 50k. Only the initial 10k counts towards expenses, you'll get a 40k training exemption.

Think of it like the NBA's luxury tax (hello to the nets fans paying millions in luxury tax for a lottery team). If you spend above a certain amount you get hit with a tax, but in BB if you trained a player yourself you get a discount that can help keep you below the tax threshold.

This Post:
11
252784.17 in reply to 252784.14
Date: 12/28/2013 12:06:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
It means $22 182 out of your $161 671 expenses are due to your trainees rising in value from training.
You could go $22 182 over your revenue and not be taxed. (adding ~70k salary player)

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
00
252784.18 in reply to 252784.17
Date: 12/28/2013 12:45:33 AM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
708708
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Maybe 2 players at $35K each
perhaps the other new rule forbids the buying of $70K for his level
do I understand this correctly?

This Post:
00
252784.19 in reply to 252784.18
Date: 12/28/2013 1:03:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
True. Don't know what the limit would be. But you're right... 70k whether it be 1,2,3,4 players more added to the roster.

It still isn't ideal as he would be losing money (rev-exp) but he just won't have the added tax (rev-exp-tax)

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
00
252784.20 in reply to 252784.19
Date: 12/28/2013 2:35:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
211211
If I buy a player at 100k but his salary bumps to lets say 130k at the start of the next season but I did not train him.will the taxation read him as a 100k player or a 130k player?

From: GM-Dyd
This Post:
11
252784.21 in reply to 252784.20
Date: 12/28/2013 3:30:11 AM
Sin City inFamous
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
710710
IMO, until a team is on National cup, tax shold take care of it. That 50k for every stagewin are still a weekly gain.

From: KwaiWah
This Post:
11
252784.22 in reply to 252784.21
Date: 12/28/2013 3:53:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3232
With regards to below quote
"
Overextension Tax is not applied on the first week of every season for all teams and for the first 4 weeks for new teams.
"
Does that mean the overextension tax will be charged on 6 Jan economy update?

Thanks in advance?

This Post:
00
252784.23 in reply to 252784.22
Date: 12/28/2013 4:05:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
Seems like a nice feature, but I don't really enjoy the fact that it was just thrown like this on the table without any previous info.

Overextension Tax Calculation
Total Revenue: $ 464 791
Total Expenses: $ -475 757
Training Exemption: $ 89 984
Overextension: $ 0
Overextension Tax Rate: 50%
Overextension Tax Total: $ 0

But it's kind of bulls**t, because normally i train a few guys and sell them for profit then get some overpaid jocks to help me promote or whatever. It seems I won't be able to do that anymore, which I think is really dumb.

From: jeff44
This Post:
00
252784.24 in reply to 252784.23
Date: 12/28/2013 4:54:01 AM
usja78
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
4848
Second Team:
BluesExplosion
one question for everyone : how is the exemption calculated when the salary formula changes from one season to another ?

From: jeff44

This Post:
00
252784.25 in reply to 252784.24
Date: 12/28/2013 5:07:23 AM
usja78
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
4848
Second Team:
BluesExplosion
and, on a more analytical note, i fear this tax will be highly deflationary on the transfer market. It is somehow a tax on salaries ,thus it lowers the value of a player, which in the end should impact transfer prices. And i guess this could be non negligeable. In my league for instance the teams that promoted in the past seasons were systematically overspending. this tax makes this strategy much more difficult, which means lots of team wont want to buy that many players anymore.

what do u think ?

Last edited by jeff44 at 12/28/2013 5:08:16 AM

Advertisement