BuzzerBeater Forums

I just give an idea, in the end we make the list for fun.

It's fact that's harder to get in B3 final then winning the National League, there could be a correction.

B3 winner 10
B3 Runner-up 6
National League 5
National Cup 3
Runner-up League and Cup 1

So few things here, again I would let the difference between the League and Cup title be 5-3 (2 points)
On your example the League title is worth like 2 Cup titles, for me, it's not the same to have 1 golden medal, or 2 golden medals, in the and the same teams play in the League and in the Cup, why should one be more worth then the other? Ofc the League is the top success you can get in your country so it should be fair about the ratio 5-3.

About the WC and Regional titles. I wouldn't mix the NT things with personal success. Not all managers are NT trainers, some of them train top NT-s, the other guys train weaker NT-s and some guys don't like to be NT trainers.

Give the best manager of the world an 40-50 NT on the ranking list, he can't make anything with it.
There is a big difference to get success with your own team, building it from nothing to the top, and being an NT manager, just call the best players of the country and put the formation, no finances, no plans, no training, nothing..

Are we sure we want to add in runner-ups ? Yes it's hard to get to the finals at any stage but at the same Time they still didn't win. Is there any way we can tie in winning percentage instead?

then i have 26 point only for b3 :D

b3 is much harder than other cups ...

I have a new point idea ...

win b3 : 20
runner up in b3 : 12
1/2 : 8
1/4 : 6
1/8 : 4
1/16 : 2
league thropy : 3
runner up in league : 1
National Tournament winner : 2
runner up in National Tournament : 1

------

you can choise 1 team from each country and create a list ...

for another promissin , you can analyze only the best active team at each country ...

Hey some on the top 20 list had a reply lol :). But I like the idea one team per county but idk about active only because most people feel like BC Torooo should be on the list as well as some other great former teams and I still feel like we should only count winners not runner ups but and winning percentage should count.
.9= 9 points
.850= 8.5 points
.8= 8 points
.750= 7.5 points
Ect.

I'm sure if someone would ask me. Runner-up is a guy who made to the final of something and he got a silver trophy, and top trophies should count symbolic with 1 point.

@Misagh Alizade: don't like your idea, too much for B3, the points should get only teams they got some trophies (gold or silver).

Btw, when I was at the top with my team on WR 1 and etc, I never tried something on B3, all those seasons I was concentrated on my League and Cup. B3 was a competition where you could win if you have 1.5 mil or more salaries, lot of other guy never tried it too, a try was not worth all those money..
Now the situation is better with the Taxes, GDP and etc where the skill of the manager is in the 1st plan.

Anyway, making this list is ungrateful, but people make it for fun, they try to see "who is the best" but the real answer no one knows. Cheers

But it always fun to have conversations ask those type of questions. Always good to have healthy debates

Nice list, but I would add extra points to teams who have repeated as B3 champions. Winning B3 is no doubt a tough accomplishment, but many teams have won by putting together unsustainable super teams. To win it multiple seasons in a row means you need a more sustainable team, that is also able to compete against managers who are going all in(buying a very expensive team) for one season.

Abrantes Basket Portugal

7 National 1st Division Titles
5 National 1st Division Runner-up
5 National Cup Titles
1 National Cup Runner Up
1 BBB Semi-Final
2 BBB Quarter-Finals

No place on the top-20?

Nice list, but I would add extra points to teams who have repeated as B3 champions. Winning B3 is no doubt a tough accomplishment, but many teams have won by putting together unsustainable super teams. To win it multiple seasons in a row means you need a more sustainable team, that is also able to compete against managers who are going all in(buying a very expensive team) for one season.

Absolutely

As for other systems the point should also consider the nation where you play. Getting xx trophies in randomstan it's not like getting a championship in top nations. Like for golden boot there should be a coefficient for every nation.

Absolutely

b3 is much harder than other cups ...

I have a new point idea ...
win b3 : 20
runner up in b3 : 12
1/2 : 8 (final 4)
1/4 : 6 (final 8)
1/8 : 4 (final 16)
1/16 : 2 (final 32)
league thropy : 3
runner up in league : 1
National Tournament winner : 2
runner up in National Tournament : 1

Great stuff

Personally Id also add on extra points for what these elite managers have achieved with NT and U21s







Last edited by Sid Vicious at 11/5/2014 6:18:16 AM

I really like the idea of the Golden Boot style scoring for the league, e.g. Pakistan will get points x1, for instance Poland maybe x2-x3 points.

Me too but I'm going to need a little help calculating because theirs so many countries. Maybe we can section off conntries and have maybe 3 or 4 more people help me calculate? Anybody ?