BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Would someone like to explain...?

Would someone like to explain...?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
8033.15 in reply to 8033.14
Date: 11/25/2007 2:28:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
appalachian state- michigan in ann arbor

stanford - usc #79 beat #1which is much bigger than two divisions of 16 teams

ohio stae - findley I'd never even heard of findley before



Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
8033.16 in reply to 8033.13
Date: 11/25/2007 8:20:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Anyhow - I'm not going to bother saying anything else - it's futile since nothing can (or would, even if it could) be done about it. But I still think that this is *ridiculous*.

This game needs a LOT of growing up to do before it comes close to being realistic...


Why, because you lost?

When thousands of games are played a week worldwide, there will be some aberrations in the results, no matter what.

You happen to be a victim of one such aberration, and that most certainly is realistic.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
8033.17 in reply to 8033.16
Date: 11/26/2007 8:07:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
24 fouls vs. 14 fouls
9 TOs vs. 3 TOs

He had more shot attempts than you did. Guess the game levels doesn't take that into account.

This Post:
00
8033.18 in reply to 8033.4
Date: 11/26/2007 5:02:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I agree that there needs be a random factor, but it seems the current algorithm sets it too high, and one in a million becomes a flip of a coin. Maybe just tone it down some?

This Post:
00
8033.19 in reply to 8033.13
Date: 11/26/2007 8:07:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
This game needs a LOT of growing up to do before it comes close to being realistic...


Bulls 97 - 93 Pistons 11/8/07
Bulls 78 - 85 Knicks 11/24/07

Clearly, the NBA needs to make their league more realistic...

Edited by brianjames (11/26/2007 8:07:42 PM CET)

Last edited by brian at 11/26/2007 8:07:42 PM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
8033.20 in reply to 8033.19
Date: 11/27/2007 9:07:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
Have you been reading this thread from the beginning...? Because you're comparing apples and oranges.

We're not talking about two teams in the same league - we're talking about one team that is a higher calibre on every level, and that is 2 levels higher, playing a bot team which is worse at every position.

Yes, in the NBA crappy teams can pull off upsets against strong teams - but even crappy NBA teams are still NBA teams and still have NBA-calibre players.

Next time the US national high school champion takes down the Pistons, THEN make your snarky comment. Until then, try and stick to relevant issues - thanks.

This Post:
00
8033.21 in reply to 8033.20
Date: 11/27/2007 9:24:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
Yes, in the NBA crappy teams can pull off upsets against strong teams - but even crappy NBA teams are still NBA teams and still have NBA-calibre players.
I would say that this thread is more about your perception of how big you believe the differences between should be, rather than what they are today. In a few seasons the best teams will start to become good. Right now there are no teams that are even close to "NBA calibre", instead all teams are on a low high school level (or perhaps worse). In other words you are the one comparing apples with oranges.

This Post:
00
8033.22 in reply to 8033.20
Date: 11/27/2007 3:40:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
We're not talking about two teams in the same league - we're talking about one team that is a higher calibre on every level, and that is 2 levels higher, playing a bot team which is worse at every position.


(http://www.usabasketball.com/seniormen/2006/06_mwc_box8.h...)

keep setting me up, ill keep knocking em out the park

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Bevzil

This Post:
00
8033.23 in reply to 8033.22
Date: 11/27/2007 4:16:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7474
In that game, I think that American's Offensive flow would be awful, and Greek's marvelous... You cannot say that Americans are 2 levels above, they are better only in physical aspects... The Greeks are better shooters... And play better as a team... I just love it when Americans underestimate some team and then lose:) Go Europe:)

From: brian

This Post:
00
8033.24 in reply to 8033.23
Date: 11/27/2007 4:39:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
In the game in question, Silver Palominos were only significantly stronger in inside scoring and offensive flow, the rest were hardly the spread that's being moaned about here. Plus, he played look inside which is a higher pace, taking less time to pass the ball around and look for the best shot.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Bevzil

This Post:
00
8033.25 in reply to 8033.24
Date: 11/27/2007 5:56:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7474
From your post, I concluded that you think USA is 2 levels above Greece, and I was answering to that... Americans are better individually, but basketball is a team sport... One player means nothing...

For Silver Palominos, I think it's very possible for him to lose many of those games, cause difference is not big at all...

Advertisement