BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Look Inside tactic STILL far too dominant!

Look Inside tactic STILL far too dominant!

Set priority
Show messages by
From: SM

This Post:
33
245985.154 in reply to 245985.143
Date: 8/28/2013 3:05:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9494
But it can't exist any debatement about how building a player that is cost effective that sees a reduction of ID to such a low level
Defenses are good to train to high level in any cost efficiency model


The key to BB is creating a salary efficient team, not running a particular tactic. Yes, in D.III where most of your experience is, 10 ID rather than 12 ID may make a big difference. Against 19 IS, it’s negligible, just as there’s not a dramatic difference between 3 ID and 5 ID against 12 IS.

Take my starting center, Macaldo, for example. His primaries are 19/9/18/4. This allows him to score efficiently (forcing opponents to think twice about running a 3-2) and rebound against even NT level bigs, while costing me a mere 85k a week. To increase his ID from 9 to 12 (which would do little to slow down elite bigs), he would cost over 120k a week. To get his ID to 18, where he would be much more effective but still struggle with a lack of SB, I would have to pay over 250k in salary.

I’ve found that investing in other areas (RB, OD, PA, etc.) produces a much more effective team.

This Post:
22
245985.155 in reply to 245985.152
Date: 8/28/2013 3:07:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
218218
The fact Li is so dominant in bb got noticed by Jonas Kazlauskas, LTU national trainer, he exclusivelly run LI no excuses, he kicked all of the snipers out of a team and got left with guys shoting like 25 percent 3pointers while being open. He gona try to do it in real life. Is he mad? Maybe no. Does he play BuzzerBeatter? Defitenely YES.

Do you know what his excuses after eurochampionship will be? I DO "Well, if we couldnt win it with LI then we would have had no chances with any other tactic, so its players fault they so shitty. Training system is broke, doesnt provide me with good outside shooters who could run outside tactics" a perfect excuse, no doubt.

PLEASE GM's STOP THIS MADDNESS!!!

Last edited by Gajus Julijus Cezaris at 8/28/2013 3:14:41 PM

This Post:
00
245985.156 in reply to 245985.153
Date: 8/28/2013 3:17:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
You know Kopitar? He's such a good guy and the biggest celebrity in our country

From: Codemasters

To: SM
This Post:
00
245985.157 in reply to 245985.154
Date: 8/28/2013 3:20:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
986986
Very good reasoning. I think you have good experience also about appropriate level of OD for C and PF. How high OD could also stop LI at D.1 level with such low ID as 9? Of course there is very few such players available....

This Post:
00
245985.158 in reply to 245985.156
Date: 8/28/2013 3:40:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
You know Kopitar? He's such a good guy and the biggest celebrity in our country


I don't know him and haven't met him, but I'm a long-time Kings fan and he quickly became my favorite player. But from the people I do know who are actually in LA who have met him or know him, he's definitely the highest quality of person off the ice too. And of course I loved the stories of Slovenians staying up essentially overnight to watch the Finals a couple of seasons ago and the eruption when he scored in OT to beat Brodeur in game 1.

From: Steve Karenn

To: SM
This Post:
00
245985.159 in reply to 245985.154
Date: 8/28/2013 3:47:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
But it can't exist any debatement about how building a player that is cost effective that sees a reduction of ID to such a low level
Defenses are good to train to high level in any cost efficiency model


The key to BB is creating a salary efficient team, not running a particular tactic. Yes, in D.III where most of your experience is, 10 ID rather than 12 ID may make a big difference. Against 19 IS, it’s negligible, just as there’s not a dramatic difference between 3 ID and 5 ID against 12 IS.

Take my starting center, Macaldo, for example. His primaries are 19/9/18/4. This allows him to score efficiently (forcing opponents to think twice about running a 3-2) and rebound against even NT level bigs, while costing me a mere 85k a week. To increase his ID from 9 to 12 (which would do little to slow down elite bigs), he would cost over 120k a week. To get his ID to 18, where he would be much more effective but still struggle with a lack of SB, I would have to pay over 250k in salary.

I’ve found that investing in other areas (RB, OD, PA, etc.) produces a much more effective team.

You did something very smart for your specific situation,and exploting the weaknesses of your adversaries team,you are a pretty good manager
The problem is that it's impossible to reproduce this strategy to the lower levels,and given that the problem of LI dominance is general,your laudable example can't alone change a comme in the debatement
Put out an NT caliver level Od or better,it's not something that can be done if not by having enough money to sustain these kinds of superdefender guards and skyhigh IS.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
245985.161 in reply to 245985.159
Date: 8/28/2013 4:19:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
The problem is that it's impossible to reproduce this strategy to the lower levels,and given that the problem of LI dominance is general,your laudable example can't alone change a comme in the debatement
Put out an NT caliver level Od or better,it's not something that can be done if not by having enough money to sustain these kinds of superdefender guards and skyhigh IS.


You're entirely backwards. The point at which LI becomes unbeatable is well above any level you (or probably I as well) willl ever reach - it's at the top end of the B3 game. Below that point, it's definitely beatable - or else I'm just living in some sort of weird hallucination this season. Please try to remember that things *YOU* can't do isn't the same thing as things that can't be done.

This Post:
00
245985.162 in reply to 245985.161
Date: 8/28/2013 4:24:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
The problem is that it's impossible to reproduce this strategy to the lower levels,and given that the problem of LI dominance is general,your laudable example can't alone change a comme in the debatement
Put out an NT caliver level Od or better,it's not something that can be done if not by having enough money to sustain these kinds of superdefender guards and skyhigh IS.


You're entirely backwards. The point at which LI becomes unbeatable is well above any level you (or probably I as well) willl ever reach - it's at the top end of the B3 game. Below that point, it's definitely beatable - or else I'm just living in some sort of weird hallucination this season. Please try to remember that things *YOU* can't do isn't the same thing as things that can't be done.

The problem of Li being dominant over the other tacticts(that doesn't mean laways unbeatable,but means that the most of the time LI wins) is at every level,not just at the very top end of B£
Don't take things too personal

Message deleted
This Post:
00
245985.164 in reply to 245985.162
Date: 8/28/2013 4:36:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
The problem of Li being dominant over the other tacticts(that doesn't mean laways unbeatable,but means that the most of the time LI wins) is at every level,not just at the very top end of B£


You keep right on believing that, and I'll keep on refuting it on the court against better teams than either of ours. ;)

Advertisement