BuzzerBeater Forums

Nice match, it shows how 2-3 works;

K. Harjula C 4-10-- 40% (3 dunks&1 driving layup)
H. Hallamäki PF 5-12---41,6% (4 dunks)
J. Merikangas C 2 - 7---- 28,5% but only 7 FG

Total a 11-29---- 37%

Thats ok, but...

If Kaksi Torniahad had outside players that apart from defending-passing were able to drive under the basket or shoot from the middle-long distance in good conditions then the situation would be different.

Even if Kaksi Tornia outside players are weak on their outside skills, they managed to score, but you defended nice because you have an insane team and so high defenses.


This match is showing that 2-3 makes you lose lot of OD(or it's so hard to counter a driving from an outside player...), if you face an opponent that apart from having nice IS's have nice outside players, then you will see how his PG or SG will end with more than 20 points.

The problem of the 2-3 is that instead of watching how the C ends with a 7-27, the PG or the SG is the one that ends with 10-20 FG's, the 2-3 doesn't help you defend better, it just changes the distribution of the shoots, in m2m you can't stop the PF-C but in normal conditions with 2-3 you can't stop the PG-SG and that's something we already said...

You stopped their outside players because you have high OD and because of the weakness of his outside players.


PS: About SB we see how useless is.


Last edited by Marot at 6/1/2011 12:06:23 PM

In 3-2 you lose a lot of ID

That's not true.

Last edited by Marot at 6/1/2011 2:28:13 PM

1 team playing R&G 2-3 and the other LI, 3-2.

There are more chances that the team playing LI his SG ends with 20-25 points or 25-30 than the team playing R&G his center scoring 20-25 points from the inside just because of the zone.

If you don't see this(the imbalances between the zones) you will see it with the time.

Last edited by Marot at 6/1/2011 2:56:58 PM

This match is showing that 2-3 makes you lose lot of OD(or it's so hard to counter a driving from an outside player...), if you face an opponent that apart from having nice IS's have nice outside players, then you will see how his PG or SG will end with more than 20 points.

The problem of the 2-3 is that instead of watching how the C ends with a 7-27, the PG or the SG is the one that ends with 10-20 FG's, the 2-3 doesn't help you defend better, it just changes the distribution of the shoots, in m2m you can't stop the PF-C but in normal conditions with 2-3 you can't stop the PG-SG and that's something we already said...

ratings are not every thing that you need till win a game ! my OD rating was weak but my team work at Perimeter Defense was so good (1-19)

yes , his PG and SG were weak but my team wholly overcome to his inside players ! anyway i dont think that if he has better guards , he could do anything more :))

Last edited by Misagh at 6/1/2011 4:04:58 PM

this is so silly !!!! he set line up for his league's games but dont set it for his B3 match .... +113 for Flumpaci ... haha ... are you sure this is inadvertent ??? i dont think so ...

B3 match : Flumpaci vs. boes 130 - 17 ((32866429))

league's games :

the mighty wizzards vs. boes 57 - 99 ((33037879))
boes vs. TumaSStars 114 - 99 ((33037887))

So is Misagh getting supporter from you?

are you sure this is inadvertent ??? i dont think so ...

And what do you think?
Flumpaci would have won the game even against the strongest lineup of boes. As I talked to flumpinka, she was surprised by the boes lineup as well as you and all of us.
You should ask scotty p (boes manager) if you want to know why he did it.