BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Player exhaustion

Player exhaustion

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
22
313819.156 in reply to 313819.152
Date: 5/19/2022 7:56:10 AM
BC Vitosha Sofia
A Grupa
Overall Posts Rated:
822822
Second Team:
Sofia Alpha Dogz
In a 7-men rotation, backups are only playing around 8' per position (around 9' if the starters' staminas are lower), which means 40' on average for each starter. It's still not worth having really good subs if the 3-position sub will only play 22-24' and the 2-position sub 16-18' on average.
I'd argue that it might be. If the sub and the starter have similar quality, that means that the sub would perform better than the starters (due to stamina skill decay) in those 22-24/16-18 mins he is on the court. There's always the risk of injury/foul-out that those subs cover as well.

Of course, it will be even better if further adjustments are made, so that the subs could spend a little more time in play, say 28-32 for three positions and 20-24 for two positions. That would bring the starters' minutes to ~37-38 which would be ideal.

I still believe the best way to counter short rosters is via GS, of course.

BBB: 2 (S37 S38); Top tier: 7 (S35 S36 S37 S38 S39 S41 S63); Cup: 9 (S25 S35 S36 S37 S38 S39 S40 S41 S61)
This Post:
11
313819.157 in reply to 313819.156
Date: 5/19/2022 8:11:47 AM
Folgado Lakers
IV.32
Overall Posts Rated:
43944394
Second Team:
Folgado Lakers II
In a 7-men rotation, backups are only playing around 8' per position (around 9' if the starters' staminas are lower), which means 40' on average for each starter. It's still not worth having really good subs if the 3-position sub will only play 22-24' and the 2-position sub 16-18' on average.
I'd argue that it might be. If the sub and the starter have similar quality, that means that the sub would perform better than the starters (due to stamina skill decay) in those 22-24/16-18 mins he is on the court. There's always the risk of injury/foul-out that those subs cover as well.

Of course, it will be even better if further adjustments are made, so that the subs could spend a little more time in play, say 28-32 for three positions and 20-24 for two positions. That would bring the starters' minutes to ~37-38 which would be ideal.

I still believe the best way to counter short rosters is via GS, of course.


YES and YES to the two things in black!

This Post:
11
313819.158 in reply to 313819.156
Date: 5/19/2022 8:41:19 AM
Valencia Basket Club (Taronjas)
A1
Overall Posts Rated:
13601360
Ι think 10% is enough. 50% of his salary is way to high. I would say 20% should be the higher extra merchandise income you can get.

About the minutes in B3 or BBM i think the changes are good. Not every team has all his players with 9-10 stamina. So in a 7 man roster a sub on 3 positions with 25 min on average and a sub on 2 positions with 18 sounds good to me, or at least way better than before.

Last edited by Aimar 21 at 5/19/2022 8:43:21 AM

From: Darkonako

This Post:
00
313819.163 in reply to 313819.162
Date: 5/19/2022 11:07:28 AM
Folgado Lakers
IV.32
Overall Posts Rated:
43944394
Second Team:
Folgado Lakers II
I don't know why homegrown players have to make the most profit.
In real life the biggest profits are made by the biggest stars no matter where they are from, and mostly those stars don’t play in their cities and countries.

Training will be in trouble if this game continue like this for sure... I wil finish training of current players in the next 3-4 seasons and then I will never train again(I am sure many guys think so even though it is a nice feeling to watch a player progress) because it is so boring, last too long, it is very expensive and I was not competitive for long time (and still I am not in the way I want to be) because these players were not good enough when they were younger, and I was spending too much on the staff and infrastructure and still I do.

I have all the data on every dollar I have given to the trainees and trainers from the day one of their training till today in these almost 8 and half seasons and it is much easier not to train players.... Only on trainers, youth trainer and infrastructure I gave over 15 milion in this 8 seasons(In the end I will return 1 milion by selling infrastructure) and there I did not count the salaries of those players and the price of their transfers.
Infrastructure 5,36 milion, trainers 9,1 m, youth trainer 0,95 m..... These are all unnecessary expenses when you do not train players...
It is much easier just to buy players.


Yes, but only when the players you wanna buy exist. The thing is that most top world teams have players that cannot be found in the market because they are unique.

If you wanna train players for profit, forget about extras and spend the minimum to make them increase their price. If you wanna create something that nobody else has, spend whatever you think you need to spend to build that player and every single dollar will be worth it.

For example, I would not even sell Guillén or Cull (1st team) for 10m each because there are no players like them in order to do what I want to do. Obviously, it would have made no sense for me to pay what I paid for them in order to build 2 standard inside players.


Last edited by Darkonako at 5/19/2022 11:09:15 AM

From: ned

To: ned
This Post:
00
313819.166 in reply to 313819.165
Date: 5/19/2022 2:51:07 PM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Didn't read the whole thread but what about to make mandatory to have 3 substitute? Not five cause I train 2 players/match

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
Advertisement