BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > BuzzerBeater Arenas

BuzzerBeater Arenas

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
56772.159 in reply to 56772.157
Date: 2/24/2009 11:30:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Managing salary takes strategy, or should. Is the argument for never ending arena sizes a way to not have to employ this strategy? So we dont have to think about how much we spend?



arena sizes is not to infinite ;) And brian maybe they could make those those money, but they won't get that, only the extra boost in PO makes them possible to sell out for those prices.

From: brian

This Post:
00
56772.160 in reply to 56772.159
Date: 2/24/2009 11:35:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
These games weren't playoff games and either sold out or nearly sold out:

(8462601)
(8462633)
(8462633)

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
56772.161 in reply to 56772.159
Date: 2/24/2009 11:45:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191

arena sizes is not to infinite ;)


Finally coming around huh? :)

So............there should be no problem with softcapping arena size then.

This Post:
00
56772.162 in reply to 56772.161
Date: 2/24/2009 11:47:05 AM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772

arena sizes is not to infinite ;)


Finally coming around huh?

So............there should be no problem with softcapping arena size then.


if the soft cap is imposed by limiting max attendance nobody is against that

This Post:
00
56772.164 in reply to 56772.162
Date: 2/24/2009 11:54:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191

if the soft cap is imposed by limiting max attendance nobody is against that


Is this true CrazyEye? You are against a softcap on how big an arena can get without small penalty but would not mind a cap on attendance?

If nobody is against this as you say, it seems the problem is solved. :)

This Post:
00
56772.165 in reply to 56772.161
Date: 2/24/2009 12:08:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959

arena sizes is not to infinite ;)


Finally coming around huh? :)

So............there should be no problem with softcapping arena size then.



The cool thing there is an soft cap, when you think economical - even actually it needs 7-9 seasons to get the investment back(nort for you, but for bigger arenas, without fees), your team gets the same in 2 seasons and don't believe it gets shorter if you build more, it will take longer and longer. And if you relegate you don't have an additional use of it, because there is also an hard cap in (used) arena size

Last edited by CrazyEye at 2/24/2009 12:09:05 PM

This Post:
00
56772.166 in reply to 56772.164
Date: 2/24/2009 12:11:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
ok maybe we made 10 different soft caps, are you satisfied?

This Post:
00
56772.167 in reply to 56772.166
Date: 2/24/2009 12:28:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Has anyone suggested some form of revenue sharing? By this, I mean that the visiting club should get a portion of the attendance money from each match. This would close the gap between the highest and lowest revenue teams in their leagues.

This Post:
00
56772.168 in reply to 56772.158
Date: 2/24/2009 1:19:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
there will be centers about 200k salary,but if you want to have one of him in your team,you have to sacrifice the salries(and so the skills)of the other players in that team,the limit of maximum incomes made by a palace is a way to have a sort of salary cup.


i ask for that already ;) But the BB are saying, that the salarys will kepp in payable balanced, and they also don't like farmteams and their policy was, the strongest players could be affordable from the strongest club.

Yeah,but i don't think that BBs says that the strongest team could be some All-stars team and the other users had to have League 2 teams