BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Draft: Bigman or Little man?

Draft: Bigman or Little man?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
188244.16 in reply to 188244.15
Date: 6/29/2011 11:47:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Well the decision is pretty tough

This Post:
00
188244.18 in reply to 188244.17
Date: 6/29/2011 11:59:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Okay thanks for the advice. One more thing, you don't really think that the "+" player B has make a big difference?

This Post:
00
188244.20 in reply to 188244.19
Date: 6/29/2011 12:15:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Ok, thanks for all that replied.

This Post:
00
188244.21 in reply to 188244.18
Date: 6/29/2011 5:29:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Okay thanks for the advice. One more thing, you don't really think that the "+" player B has make a big difference?

"A" player can look pretty abysmal compared to "A+" player. The starting salary can go up to 8000, so it's a huge step from 4500.
Short PF prospects are very intriguing! Because possessing good starting big skills they train faster in guard skills than usual bigs, making them more rounded and thus more effective for same money.
Let's take a worst case scenario: your 6'6 PF has respectable Shot Blocking. He will still have to have 2 respectables, 1 average and 1 mediocre in JS, IS, ID, RB.
If he has inept SB (middle), then he'll have at least 3 resp., 1 aver. in those PF defining skills!
The first player (A) is not bad either, but you would hate to see atrocious IS, when you draft him. And that is not unlikely.

Last edited by thylacine at 6/29/2011 5:41:35 PM

This Post:
00
188244.22 in reply to 188244.21
Date: 6/29/2011 8:44:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Wow I never thought of it like that.

From: LaCross

This Post:
00
188244.23 in reply to 188244.22
Date: 6/29/2011 11:02:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
176176
I don't know if you trained the SF American guy that's on your roster. If you did, take the PG and train him. Training an SF is a hard and complicated work. Finding the balance to create a player that will actually function with his skills needs some experience. Just as you hate to see your PG having a high driving skill, but atrocious IS, you hate to see your PF having a high ID but weak Rebounding.

If I were you, there wouldn't be any question about me drafting the PG over an undersized PF.

From: Horns23

This Post:
11
188244.24 in reply to 188244.23
Date: 6/29/2011 11:42:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Wow thanks. You guys are making this a tough decision. I keep switching these 2 guys around on my draft list. Half of you say one player and another half say another. This is tough.

From: Horns23

This Post:
00
188244.25 in reply to 188244.24
Date: 6/29/2011 11:44:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
And Lacross I did train that SF guy. He was my first ever drat pick.

This Post:
11
188244.26 in reply to 188244.25
Date: 6/30/2011 1:54:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
With that great SF you have (remember that SFs are underpriced in this game), I'd go for the 6'0 PG.

Check the Suggestions they are important
Advertisement