BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > 3 National Teams

3 National Teams

Set priority
Show messages by
From: RHTM
This Post:
00
318629.16 in reply to 318629.1
Date: 5/5/2023 9:14:52 AM
Pers0wnages
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
6262
Second Team:
Pers0wnages II
What about a reserve NT team with players with a maximum potential of Superstar (or even perennial allstar)? This would allow smaller nations to compete since their talent pool will increase and players would be capped in skills. This competition would be something equivalent to a BBM tier, allowing for more equal competition and putting more emphasis on tactical decisions. It could also motivate managers to train players with lower potentials. One problem I could foresee is that players should be able to both compete in the main team and reserve team in order not to punish small teams who's Superstar players might already be in the main team.

Last edited by RHTM at 5/5/2023 9:15:17 AM

This Post:
00
318629.18 in reply to 318629.17
Date: 5/7/2023 1:16:10 AM
Tampines Fusion
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
433433
Technically the Consolation tourney is a competition for the second tier teams right xD

This Post:
11
318629.20 in reply to 318629.17
Date: 5/7/2023 6:49:12 PM
Wuhan Wastrels
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
Having teams limited by potential is too artificial imho.


What about having an NT with a salary limit instead of potential? 100K?
I'm sure this would cause an influx of well-rounded and diverse players to the TL

If not, what about a total salary cap for the NT team? That way there is more emphasis on the coaches abilities rather than the size of their country.

Just spit-balling ideas here

This Post:
00
318629.22 in reply to 318629.21
Date: 5/8/2023 7:43:08 AM
Tampines Fusion
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
433433
4 seasons would also be perfect for U21 managers to see their 18 year olds bloom into 21 year olds xD

This Post:
22
318629.24 in reply to 318629.23
Date: 5/9/2023 5:14:15 AM
Isca Centurions
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
387387
Second Team:
Dartmoor Pumas
I think elections should stay as two seasons to give nations a chance to replace bad managers. It's very hard to replace a manager by dropping them below the 25% positive threshold even if they are doing dodgy stuff.

This Post:
11
318629.25 in reply to 318629.23
Date: 5/9/2023 5:15:51 AM
Durham Wasps
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
16621662
Second Team:
Sunderland Boilermakers
I don't see any reason why two elections in one year would be a problem.

Elections every four years? Terrible idea. Ask those countries who have been stuck with a bad manager for two seasons.

This Post:
00
318629.26 in reply to 318629.24
Date: 5/9/2023 6:29:10 AM
Tampines Fusion
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
433433
Maybe we can have one every 4 seasons, but a 2 season option if a Manager's rating falls below a certain percentage. Or keep it at biannually but extendable to 4 seasons should a manager have really good ratings.

Advertisement