BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > BuzzerBeater's Best (B3-season17)

BuzzerBeater's Best (B3-season17)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
190315.164 in reply to 190315.163
Date: 8/29/2011 5:14:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
But they are big men, there are very few bigs who average a significant amount of assists.

Check the Suggestions they are important
From: Flamen

This Post:
00
190315.167 in reply to 190315.166
Date: 8/30/2011 3:43:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13621362
This Post:
00
190315.168 in reply to 190315.167
Date: 8/30/2011 5:24:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6060
Nitra Cordons looks pretty good to me, and doesn't have a very high salary either, which might result in a big buy before semifinals..

Nevertheless, this B3 season seems very interesting. The only not-so-interesting thing is that every strong team plays look inside, which is quite boring and leaves no room for tactical choices.

This Post:
11
190315.169 in reply to 190315.168
Date: 8/30/2011 6:16:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Besides Look inside, to me the M2M defense is boring. We have so much defensive choices, yet M2M is the only one used. With 3-2, opponent's guards are shooting over your PF and C. If you choose 2-3, opponent's guards are shooting over...nobody. If you choose 1-3-1, you get mauled on boards and opponent's guards are, again, shooting over your bigs. If you choose FCP...you lose. And two new defenses (Outside and Inside box-and-one) aren't tested enough.

So what does a range of defensive choices do for us if there is only one good defense left? In real life, defense is changing during the game from M2M to 2-3, to 1-2-2, then back to M2M...

Message deleted
This Post:
00
190315.171 in reply to 190315.169
Date: 8/30/2011 6:46:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
3-2 is accepted as a working tactic from nearly all, and is used even when with different strength of the roster you normally go for the safe way and play man to man to make nothing wrong.

And yes i am one of the few player who say 2-3 is good to, but i already beated some of the world elite team with it like secret Agent(current wr 1), Frydek and Flumpanci. And i won't say that my roster is stronger then their roster.

i used 1-3-1 in the championship final, and was surprised by my win in a away game with less effort ;)

Last edited by CrazyEye at 8/30/2011 6:49:02 AM

This Post:
00
190315.172 in reply to 190315.171
Date: 8/30/2011 7:06:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I agree that 3-2 is the best of non-M2M defenses, but I don't still don't like it. I advocated it until I played some "real" games for qualification into 2nd league last season. I played 3-2 against opponent's Motion and in fourth quarter, almost all shots of his PG were over my PF or C. Not funny.

This Post:
11
190315.173 in reply to 190315.171
Date: 8/30/2011 7:59:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6060
3:2 works good against outside offenses, even better than m2m.

But then again, how many strong teams use outside offenses? 95% of world leading teams in BB use Look Inside.

This Post:
11
190315.174 in reply to 190315.173
Date: 8/30/2011 10:11:44 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12021202
Second Team:
Jirkov
In general you are right. But there are some exceptions in particular matches, e.g. (38851480), (38851311).
But why it's like that? Simply because with limited wage budget it's really expensive to build team which can in effective way defend LI, but it's very cheap to build team that can defend outside attacks effectivelly and almost impossible to build team for outside attack which can beat good outside defense even if the opponent plays M2M.

Advertisement