BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Look Inside tactic STILL far too dominant!

Look Inside tactic STILL far too dominant!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
245985.166 in reply to 245985.160
Date: 8/28/2013 5:12:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
Stay on topic, and don't troll.

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
00
245985.168 in reply to 245985.159
Date: 8/28/2013 8:11:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
The problem is that it's impossible to reproduce this strategy to the lower levels


You would need to explain why you something that works at the highest level can't work in lower divisions because I don't see how this could be true?

From what I remember playing in the lower divisions teams were successful with all sorts of different offensive and defensive tactics. I can remember wining my D3 league playing outside tactics. It isn't until the highest levels of BB that the successful teams have all gravitated towards 1 offensive and 1 defensive tactic.

Last edited by Beener not Beanerz at 8/28/2013 8:14:46 PM

From: GM-hrudey

This Post:
00
245985.170 in reply to 245985.169
Date: 8/28/2013 10:41:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
High guard skills, OD a must, try some JR...
punt ID
High RB, this is a must
IS medium to high for scoring purposes
SB, jack it up, costs 1/2 what IS and ID do....but we need to see it working..


Or the JS/JR/DR can take care of the offense and then you can punt the IS so the guy doesn't waste offensive rebounds attempting putbacks that will rarely work, and instead try to get the offense started again.

Another big issue is its pointless, from my perspective, to evaluate SB on players with no OD. We KNOW OD works.


Yes, yes, 100 times yes.

This Post:
00
245985.171 in reply to 245985.168
Date: 8/28/2013 10:43:37 PM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
708708
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Tried Center this past season with 17/16 ID/SB
he didn't have much in the way of scoring skills
was hoping he could be a defensive stopper, didn't much like the results
I'm sure there were other forces at work but was hoping for more

This Post:
00
245985.172 in reply to 245985.171
Date: 8/29/2013 12:07:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
that suck man. It really does because I was doing this theory as well .. I was putting it on my guards .It's just to dang expensive. I'm not going break my bank account trying any more.

Can ask a question what defensive tactic did you use.? which one did this player have best result. I know m2m or3-2 zone.. Can you try 2-3 please let me know it if works.. I think you'll need some back bench scoring though.

This Post:
00
245985.176 in reply to 245985.168
Date: 8/29/2013 3:59:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
The problem is that it's impossible to reproduce this strategy to the lower levels


You would need to explain why you something that works at the highest level can't work in lower divisions because I don't see how this could be true?

From what I remember playing in the lower divisions teams were successful with all sorts of different offensive and defensive tactics. I can remember wining my D3 league playing outside tactics. It isn't until the highest levels of BB that the successful teams have all gravitated towards 1 offensive and 1 defensive tactic.

In the lower divisions the situation change slightly because it become an economy management problem,but the teams that can put together an efficient LI the most of the time beat the teams that can put together an efficient outside offense

I don't know why many users keep thinking that it's only a I division/B3 problem,we all play under the same GE -.-"
What you see at the highest level is reflected in the lower divisions too,with the relative differences because of the skills.I've played also at an higher level to the one where I actually am,so it's not like I have not sen player with highest skills than the one I actually play against

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 8/29/2013 4:03:07 AM

Advertisement