BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Training

Training

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
202941.17 in reply to 202941.15
Date: 11/24/2011 4:43:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
I have btw trained REB for team. Not only one week.
What would you expect from this suggestion then? That everyone would improve on the team like they were single position trained. The guys suggested for extra training even faster. Comon. If this would be implemented, the training would be even slower than the current team training + the singled out training would be slower aswell to compensate the "team improvement". So where is the gain?

From: JON

This Post:
00
202941.18 in reply to 202941.17
Date: 11/24/2011 4:47:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2828
I think younger players who get minutes @ PF / CENTER should get small training allocated to them, enough that you could get 4/5 pops from them in a season. Players at SG, PG, SF will not get any at all or very tiny (SF) maybe.
Right now, the only reason to even own a young player is for training that's it. Young players on your team is meaningless if you are not training.


Last edited by JON at 11/24/2011 4:50:46 PM

From: Kukoc

To: JON
This Post:
00
202941.19 in reply to 202941.18
Date: 11/24/2011 5:12:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
No comment...

This Post:
00
202941.21 in reply to 202941.1
Date: 12/3/2011 4:15:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
You have my support.
A player that is being trained and get minutes improves upon his potential and age, even if not as drastically as a player who get personal training.

Training and game time keeps a player in game-shape regardless, but that has nothing to do with the improvement part that is parallel to the game-shape issue.

Would it affect the game? Yes of course and by definition.
Would it make the game worse? Not at all. It will make training and training desicions a bigger part of the game at the expense of the "eBay" part.