I don't think it's just luck. Njie, for example, shot ~.770 with stamina ~inept, and .800 or better with average+ stamina. His FTs are proficient, and I haven't trained FTs more than once during the observation period. Given that the observations are over multiple seasons, the statistical significance should be pretty high. That's why I think stamina, at least observationally, is important.
I repeated your experiment, though I decided to improve it in two ways:
(1) set a minimum respectable level of stamina, and
(2) count the total number of free throws taken until I have a total which can make some sort of reliable predictions.
The figure I ended up with was 16 makes in 78 attempts which is ~.200 (the specific observations were: 1-5, 0-7, 1-2, 1-4, 0-8, 4-17, 2-10, 0-4, 0-6, 7-15).
There is quite a bit of variability among observations. High atrocious obviously does much better than low atrocious. Though the average success of a mid-atrocious FT shooter who doesn't have god-awful stamina should probably be about .200. Low atrocious is obviously close to .000, and high atrocious may be even as good as .300.
Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 6/25/2009 3:40:50 PM
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."