BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > New inside zone or fix 2-3.

New inside zone or fix 2-3.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
181900.177 in reply to 181900.176
Date: 6/13/2011 3:08:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
I think 2-3 is not flawed. It's just a poor little misunderstood kid whom no one wanna play with...

I want to play with it.


They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
181900.178 in reply to 181900.177
Date: 6/20/2011 4:17:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
Hey EVERYONE, the 2-3 ZONE WORKS! (15422). YEAH!

Check the Suggestions they are important
From: Marot
This Post:
00
181900.179 in reply to 181900.1
Date: 6/25/2011 4:16:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
(32901902)

Kinda nice how a weak player can score 29 points that easy...

This Post:
00
181900.180 in reply to 181900.179
Date: 6/25/2011 6:44:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
181900.181 in reply to 181900.179
Date: 6/26/2011 4:44:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
(32832544) - the only think you could argue his is 3pt percentage in the last minute, but i believe thats more random ;)

From: Marot

This Post:
00
181900.182 in reply to 181900.181
Date: 6/26/2011 10:12:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
But your game shapes were much better...

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
11
181900.183 in reply to 181900.182
Date: 7/3/2011 9:39:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
my "2-3" games of the last 2 weeks:

(32903150) - i believe you could talk about an underdog win here, with playing only with one starting guard out of position.

(32903123) - away without my best playyer(ok he subbed out for the sf who trained on sg for 7 because of 6 fouls), it was at least not an easy win, but maybe i would done it with mtm too.

(32832544) - the already mentioned game against frydek, ok i had the ebtter gameshape but it was still frydek.



This Post:
00
181900.184 in reply to 181900.183
Date: 7/4/2011 6:50:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
229229
That's cool. You were supposed to have lost all 3 games

Analising your ratings, it doesn't seem that your inside players have supernatural skills. They just look good enough. So what's your point here? Do your inside players have something special that others don't? Does it have something to do with SB? Or let's just settle down that 2-3 isn't that useless?

This Post:
00
181900.185 in reply to 181900.184
Date: 7/4/2011 8:34:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
The soup(boulillon) and Lloyd have both very weak ID(blocking 5/8), but OD 8. Dachsbau who play SF normally have OD 11(high Sub), and a good ID and low blocking(8). Alabora is the only bigs who play without OD(just 4), and the other one who had ID and blocking in an ok area(15/11). I often used an SF there also in the guard spot with 14 OD and 10 ID(just a little bit weaker then the first mentioned C's) and with none blocking(1).

So i don't think that my big are extra ordinary, besides the medium OD they got. But as i said, 2-3 works for me, the shooting percentage isn't much weaker, but i get extra possesion through rebound in comparision to mtm which improve my defense noticeable.

And i never had problems with the 2-3 Zone, when it used against an team actually playing inside even when nobody believes me - with weird reason that his offense didn't work because he choosed the wrong defense and so on.

From: Marot

This Post:
00
181900.186 in reply to 181900.183
Date: 7/4/2011 6:51:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Well i can't say if the zone worked or not in this close game by just looking the boxscore(and also i dont have time to see if it worked).

On the 2on match with m2m you were winning since your attack was better than his OD.

On the 3rd I have my doubts you did a good defense, but anyway your offensive flow won you the game.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
181900.187 in reply to 181900.186
Date: 7/5/2011 4:11:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Well i can't say if the zone worked or not in this close game by just looking the boxscore(and also i dont have time to see if it worked).


but you noticed that i played with only one guard(playing SF) and the weaker inside big men in game one, ok maybe you could count the backup SF and PF also as Guards?

On the 2on match with m2m you were winning since your attack was better than his OD.


Maybe i would win game two, but it would be close, and i though 2-3 was so broke that this is oimpossible? By the way my opponent plays mtm is it broke? And i could show you also many matches where you loose besides having stronger outside attack like that.

On the 3rd I have my doubts you did a good defense, but anyway your offensive flow won you the game.


did you expect that you don't need any offensive anymore when you play 2-3?

Last edited by CrazyEye at 7/5/2011 4:19:45 AM

Advertisement