BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Cup final in neutral venue

Cup final in neutral venue

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
10473.18 in reply to 10473.15
Date: 1/10/2008 4:53:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
I haven't bothered to calculate it or anything, but I have doubts that your total income for the season was higher becuase of that money. If you were forced to sacrifice even road games in your regular season it would affect attendance probably as much as you earn from those games. What good is making an extra 20k in a cup game if you lose it in revenue because of losses elsewhere?

Simply put, the better your team plays the better attendance you have. Now, while focusing on home games will mitigate that problem a little bit you still will have a lesser record to overcome which will decrease attendance. On the other hand losing cup games does not seem to have any result on attendance.

This Post:
00
10473.19 in reply to 10473.18
Date: 1/10/2008 5:22:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
On the other hand losing cup games does not seem to have any result on attendance.


I can assure you that it does, but remember that you only lose one per season.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
10473.20 in reply to 10473.19
Date: 1/10/2008 7:20:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Fair enough, but as you said....you only lose one.

My point still stands...if it costs you 5 or 6 league games to go deep in the tournament it seems unlikely that the meager amount you make during those cup games makes up for lost attendance at home during league play.

Unless you dominate your league like BC Törööö dominates ours. His bench could probably make a deep cup run if he chose without his sacrificing much of anything during league play.

I'm not here to say that I want changes to the cup system...I'm just here to say that I think it is pointless for anyone to bother trying to win it.

This Post:
00
10473.21 in reply to 10473.17
Date: 1/10/2008 1:23:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
You treated the cup pretty similar to how I did, and you were in a similar position with your league expectations.

... Doesn't solve the training minutes problem, though, but I guess that's the tradeoff with the increased money from cup games. (Well, from home cup games, anyway.)


See, here's my problem. I had 8 out of 10 road games in my cup run, and most (all?) of them were in default-size arenas. The income for me in those games was not good. Maybe things are a little different in the USA with more teams with expanded arenas?

Edited by oeuftete (1/10/2008 1:23:45 PM CET)

Last edited by Mod-oeuftete at 1/10/2008 1:23:45 PM

This Post:
00
10473.22 in reply to 10473.18
Date: 1/10/2008 4:42:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I haven't bothered to calculate it or anything, but I have doubts that your total income for the season was higher becuase of that money. If you were forced to sacrifice even road games in your regular season it would affect attendance probably as much as you earn from those games. What good is making an extra 20k in a cup game if you lose it in revenue because of losses elsewhere?

Simply put, the better your team plays the better attendance you have. Now, while focusing on home games will mitigate that problem a little bit you still will have a lesser record to overcome which will decrease attendance. On the other hand losing cup games does not seem to have any result on attendance.

All of my home league games this season were sellouts, even though they were following my away league losses. I was quite surprised about this.

This Post:
00
10473.23 in reply to 10473.21
Date: 1/10/2008 4:44:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
See, here's my problem. I had 8 out of 10 road games in my cup run, and most (all?) of them were in default-size arenas. The income for me in those games was not good. Maybe things are a little different in the USA with more teams with expanded arenas?

I should probably mention that I played 7 of my 9 cup games at home. That's probably significant. :)

This Post:
00
10473.24 in reply to 10473.22
Date: 1/10/2008 7:46:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Except for your last TV game at home.

...but it would seem then than as a whole you got lucky, because as has been explained you should have lost attendance because of your losses.

This Post:
00
10473.25 in reply to 10473.24
Date: 1/10/2008 8:21:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Except for your last TV game at home.

...but it would seem then than as a whole you got lucky, because as has been explained you should have lost attendance because of your losses.

The last TV game at home came after a home league loss, an away league loss, and a cup loss (rather than after an a home win and an away loss). 200 bleachers were unsold for the TV game, which amounts to $3400 lost revenue, which was more than offset by the cup game.

I think the important point here is not that I was lucky, but that my arena is too small to show the effect my losses have on attendance.

From: dhoff

This Post:
00
10473.27 in reply to 10473.26
Date: 1/11/2008 2:26:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I think the important point here is not that I was lucky, but that my arena is too small to show the effect my losses have on attendance.


Speaking of which...what have you been doing with all that extra cash then?

I blew $1.2M on three trainees. Been throwing the rest at the arena, piece by piece. I've got about $1M on hand right now in case something catches my fancy on the TL.

Advertisement