BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > What can be done in 1 second?

What can be done in 1 second?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Soel
This Post:
00
118137.18 in reply to 118137.17
Date: 11/10/2009 10:50:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
I agree this is a bit disheartening. But remember the outcome for the match is worked out before the game airs. Who wins is based on the total team stats rater than taking the game play-by-play. So even though you lost by some extrodinary circumstance it's likely that the final result was the correct one.

I expect the BB's are working on this. I too have laughed at my own player dunking home their own missed 3-point attempt but I expect these are bugs in the way the game is presented, not bugs in the way the final result is calculated.

Last edited by Soel at 11/10/2009 10:51:16 AM

From: Weakling

To: Soel
This Post:
00
118137.19 in reply to 118137.18
Date: 11/11/2009 5:23:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Really? I didn't knew that. I though the game generation was play-to-play, obviously not exactly live but approximately live. OK, even so there shouldn't be these impossible plays. As you say, I hope their being corrected.

From: CrazyEye

To: Soel
This Post:
00
118137.20 in reply to 118137.18
Date: 11/11/2009 1:53:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I agree this is a bit disheartening. But remember the outcome for the match is worked out before the game airs. Who wins is based on the total team stats rater than taking the game play-by-play. So even though you lost by some extrodinary circumstance it's likely that the final result was the correct one.


missmatches are used in calculation, the play by play even effects the ratings through changes of the tactical order and maybe stamina.

From: AfonsoP
This Post:
00
118137.21 in reply to 118137.20
Date: 11/11/2009 6:01:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
Brad Miller is the guy that we have to ask this question...

From: /joao

This Post:
00
118137.22 in reply to 118137.21
Date: 11/11/2009 7:01:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Not him, since he failed to go with .3

Ask Fisher and the infamous .4 miracle.

From: AfonsoP

This Post:
00
118137.23 in reply to 118137.22
Date: 11/11/2009 7:20:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
Not him, since he failed to go with .3

Ask Fisher and the infamous .4 miracle.


Yeah, I guess you're right. Brad Miller is the right guy to tell us what can't be done in 1 second...

This Post:
00
118137.25 in reply to 118137.21
Date: 11/14/2009 5:22:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Why Brad Miller? Did he performed another 1-second-miracle lately that i missed?

From: Vikman

This Post:
00
118137.26 in reply to 118137.25
Date: 11/14/2009 5:37:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Why Brad Miller? Did he performed another 1-second-miracle lately that i missed?

Well 1-second almost miracle. A few days ago against the Bulls he hit a game winner that looked like he got it off on time but upon review by the refs it was waived off. It was just barely touching the tips of his fingers as time expired.

This Post:
00
118137.27 in reply to 118137.25
Date: 11/14/2009 5:40:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
Why Brad Miller? Did he performed another 1-second-miracle lately that i missed?


A couple of nights ago, he did. Well, he didn't. Ok, he did, but, at the same time, he didn't :P

He was able to get a good look, get the ball from the inbound pass, make a shot without almost looking (a long 2-pointer), when the Bulls were down by 1. And all of that in just 0.3 seconds. But then, the refs thought that there were a slightly possibility that 0.3 seconds wasn't enough time to make that shot so, in the end, Brad Miller's lucky didn't even appeared in the box score x)