BuzzerBeater Forums

I have a question, in the MVP vote, where it says 1º, 2º, 3º, 4º and 5º those are the judges? Cose i really dont understand much the form of the votation.

Thx

Since no one actually answered your question.... the judges vote for 5 players each from 1st choice to 5th choice then points for place are added up to see who gets MVP. So if you had a player with a 3 under the 4 and a 6 under the 5 column that means your player got 3 4th place votes and 6 5th place votes

MVP Voting
Voted
Player Team 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Points
Bertran Cuevas 3PointMadness 32 0 0 0 0 192
Jeffrey Kelly 3PointMadness 0 32 0 0 0 128
Santiago Peña 3PointMadness 0 0 32 0 0 96
Ryszard Klapkowski 3PointMadness 0 0 0 14 13 41
Enrique Montoya 3PointMadness 0 0 0 12 13 37
Siniša Paraga 3PointMadness 0 0 0 6 6 18

Dude, you are in D V. Not that surprising.

Thanks for the answer.

I was just giving you a sneak peek of who to look out for when they all mature n beat ur ass in the next few yrs

I have a question, in the MVP vote, where it says 1º, 2º, 3º, 4º and 5º those are the judges?

The judges are: Charles, Mark, Forrest, Edju and Patrick.

I voted for Pedro.

Ah, thanks for clearing that up. The way you describe is pretty neat I must say.

I have a question, in the MVP vote, where it says 1º, 2º, 3º, 4º and 5º those are the judges?

The judges are: Charles, Mark, Forrest, Edju and Patrick.

hehe, right...

no. actually fans are voting for the players. Teams that get better results, and thereby have more fans, have higher chance of getting a MVP player.

a big factor in mvp voting however is that the player is known to the fans in the league, and that means being in the top 10 list of the league.

to get in there, it is important to play many games as starter in the league.

So the mvp player isn't always the best player. it's as the title says: the most VALUABLE player. if the better lpayer played less minutes or less games, he might be better, but didn't add that much for the team, and thereby is less valuable.

Hope this all makes sense.

In short: to get the mvp award you need:
a good player (not necessarily the best)
who plays a lot of minutes in league games
and plays a lot of games during the season

Personally I think that if your team is very balanced, and you are a good tactician switching tactics often, and divide minutes evenly over your players, there's little chance to get the mvp award, as there are always managers in the league who have their team drive on 1 key player, and play him often and a lot.
So if you never win the mv award. Don't worry, it doesn't make you a bad manager. ;)

I was just giving you a sneak peek of who to look out for when they all mature n beat ur ass in the next few yrs

Gee, I cant wait!

You will probably need a bit more than your roster full of MVPs though.

Last edited by Heathcoat at 4/6/2011 3:58:43 PM

I find your statements pretty arguable.
Looking at my league.

favorite movie of last ten years