My mistake for thinking he was in Division IV. I know he didn't break any rules but I just think its not for the best of the game to sell all your players and leave causing anyone who plays you, for the next month, to see a forfeited game. I don't want to argue about this so I'm not going to say anything more. This is just what I feel about it.
You have an obligation to do what's best for the game? Nah. You have an obligation to do what's best for your team. The developers then have to adjust the game in ways that will make the two coincide. If they fail, the game goes down. It's that simple.
i kind of feel like the system the developers have set up is about as good as there can be in the situation. as a veteran of several of these manager games, what he did isn't considered criminal across the board. its almost an altruistic act, giving the opponents a chance to win over an opponent who would prefer not to play. whats worse, a win without competition or a loss to nothing?