BuzzerBeater Forums

Thats not my general point. As a experienced manager you should read the rest of sentences. The whole point is to get as much trianing as possible. That does not mean direct training, it means to make the player adjust to the train'n he will be getting long term. Its called placing him in tactic to be effective something you should know.

But i doubt you'll read that far to understang my gerneral points.I know you'll look for holes to say this or that which i think is very petty.

My ending point was my whole point in a nut shell. Maybe you cant start right there. He should build both*.As far as the rest of post he can void it becuase it wasnt directed to the op but my replyr. Its my personal assesment to him not the op.

But to the Op he should get and train both aswell as build arena.

This has to be a troll. Nobody thinks "the player" needs to know anything about anything. Our players don't have emotions/egos

My whole point is to win games early. 3pts is worth more than 2pts. Assist are worth their salts in close games. Those are the things manager will have to master early to be successful.
[...]
Thats how i see it. The more great player he can bring up the better. He shouldn't just go for 1 great player. Balanced teams win more than one way team. My ending point

I utterly disagree with most of what you write in general and in your post, but I will give you credit for typing the words above as they are actually somehow wise.

The things I personally put a lot of stock in when evaluating a team and their performance:
1. How much salary do they pay their 6th-10th (or even deeper) players? The better their backups and reserves, the more likely they are to weather injuries and to gain ground late in quarters against tired starters or overmatched scrubs.
2. Can they at least put up a credible inside offense, inside defense, outside offense and outside defense? Some teams can put up very nice ratings in inside offenses only, but they don't have the ability to mix in a changeup tactic - which means they'd better be darned good at their primary tactic to overcome the GDP.
3. Turnovers, turnovers, turnovers! Assists might go here too, because that's a very important part too, but if you show me a team that's among the best in the league both in avoiding turnovers and in forcing their opponent to turn it over, and they're putting up a decent defense, you've got a perennial contender.

A all around sf take time to build his skill wont be able to play the harder tactic till later when he is more developed.A pg skill are always going ready to play tactic regardless of good or bad. It just how the game works.Unless his ksill are greater than everyone else at time.

I have to disagree not saying your wrong but on principles of timing of the player. I have game seen games where the big man pretty dominate the dynamic sf. With big men having outside defense as well as inside as of late. Nothing that sf could do beyond pass. Alot pf ./C have outside defense now mores dynamic than every before with shot blocking increase, a dynamic Sf has be up onhis A game every game, with none having great skills to compliment him it pretty much a waste of team and time, one man cant do it all. When they are1st starting off his skill wont be so great( the op is 5 league).So what your saying is later in his career,

A pg that is not the case. Most tactic are built toward the pg in mind, only1-2 for Sf. Same as li/Lp is built for big man in mind. What this leads to is limted skill to be successful earlyas you build him. Im not talking about creating mix- matches. Im talking pure skills for the tactic. This why is i say *I would take pg 1st*. but the op should take both and train them to highest level to achieve this goals.

Not to disgree with what you have shown or anything. On personal prefences i would take the Pg 1st, I honestly feel A pg will win you more games than a sf.

Jump Shot: marvelous Jump Range: prominent
Outside Def.: tremendous Handling: sensational
Driving: marvelous Passing: wondrous
Inside Shot: strong Inside Def.: wondrous
Rebounding: average Shot Blocking: average
Stamina: strong Free Throw: marvelous

Experience: strong

i would say allstar or higher. This is just a plan example of bsic dynamic PG. I would this highly possible for any manager to do.Anything higher would be harder and very expensive. This guard could play 5 tactic to about 15ppg and 8 asst game.

Players = managers such as yourself and myself. If we dont need to know anything then I guess it would be in our best intrest to ask to close the help guide.

A all around sf take time to build his skill wont be able to play the harder tactic till later when he is more developed.A pg skill are always going ready to play tactic regardless of good or bad. It just how the game works.Unless his ksill are greater than everyone else at time.

I have to disagree not saying your wrong but on principles of timing of the player. I have game seen games where the big man pretty dominate the dynamic sf. With big men having outside defense as well as inside as of late. Nothing that sf could do beyond pass. Alot pf ./C have outside defense now mores dynamic than every before with shot blocking increase, a dynamic Sf has be up onhis A game every game, with none having great skills to compliment him it pretty much a waste of team and time, one man cant do it all. When they are1st starting off his skill wont be so great( the op is 5 league).So what your saying is later in his career,

A pg that is not the case. Most tactic are built toward the pg in mind, only1-2 for Sf. Same as li/Lp is built for big man in mind. What this leads to is limted skill to be successful earlyas you build him. Im not talking about creating mix- matches. Im talking pure skills for the tactic. This why is i say *I would take pg 1st*. but the op should take both and train them to highest level to achieve this goals.

Not to disgree with what you have shown or anything. On personal prefences i would take the Pg 1st, I honestly feel A pg will win you more games than a sf.

You have no idea what you are talking about. First of all, I am training a SF and I can play any tactic. Part of that is because my SF is very balanced or as you put it "dynamic", his PG skills are nearly as good as most PG in my league so I can take advantage of his inside skill by running Look Inside and he can hold his own inside against most C in my league so I can win this matchup by going with Motion or Patient. Building a SF does not mean you have to completely throw away your season, especially at the lower levels.

I don't think there are any tactics which are built specifically for any players. A PG is going to handle the ball in any of the tactics. And the fact that you don't know that the inside skills of your 1-3 really takes the look inside tactic over the top simply shows that you learned nothing when you were studying the game at D5.

yes. thank you.

Defense is hard to master on this game. having a good defense is a blessing early for any team,after some time with trianing these players the op will have a great defense not just a good one but a great one for 10-12 season. He can play that same exact team for 15 season. 10-12 of those he will have the best defense in the league and can win himself some titles. I didnt know that till my 7 season.

Once you start going one way in program for your ball club. It hard to correct your self. This why im saying get a balance team early, build 2 great players at a time.

At this point in time, coming into the draft im thinking about drafting a C/PF, my two bigs are slowly getting older and will need to be replaced. In the time being my backup bigs arent all too flash.
Although i would like to draft a PF/C I can also see the pros to drafting a PG/SG so that next season i can also train Anson and Lin cheng, it would feel like a waste if i dont continue to train both of those players for another season at least.
So is it worth it building my bigs or continuing to strengthen my you guards?

I think you should continue to strengthen your guards. However, since they are 20 and 22, their training will go slower than if they were 18 or 19. As soon as you can get an 18 year old with at least allstar potential, I would focus on the 18 year old. Your starting bigs still have some time, so you don't need to worry too much yet.