BuzzerBeater Forums

*sigh* we are not going to see eye to eye on this. Curry went nowhere playoff wise with the Warriors before D Lee because he was still gaining experience and GS had no big presence. Andries Biedris was their center for awhile and they were constantly dominated down low. Players were added in D Lee and others not to run the show but to be productive. D Lee was never meant to become their superstar. Also Kerr only took the last shot because Jordan was double teamed and he was in the right place at the right time. Jordan took 95% of the final shots for the Bulls that season. In crucial times you get the ball to your closer which is Curry for GS. I like to think of myself as someone who knows basketball very well and I believe that *you're (not your) not arguing with logical points from a NBA and management standpoint. I guess I got in what I needed to say but your probably still will not agree with these points so this is probably the last I will post about it with you. No need to continue he two man argument.

Last edited by E.B.W. at 5/21/2014 12:26:41 AM

Oh now, its not a logical argument since I pointed out the facts to moot. ok..

Again if you think taking the last in a game make a player the best on the team . Then you need understand that called is clutch factor, he is good in clutch scenarios, that does not make him the best player on the team. All players have different type of talents on the court(skill sets). This is why the coach draws up a play to maximize those talents(skill sets).


Your not trying to understand. if the owner bought all the player to assist curry that cost millions of dollars, then he want championships or everybody better to help the team in trades or capital , etc.. If the new talent is not getting to where they need to be, no one but only one man. Who fault is that.?

That's the head coach job, thats a business perspective called sub staining and raising player values. The owner doesn't want to be throwing millions at these players and only one get better. He paid for all of them to get better and win. He put those other player there so they can lead. That's a business thing these player aren't coming for free, winning games or not?. Btw I think you bias versus D lee. He was one of best free agents in the nba for his position in the market a few years ago. One of the best Pf in nba.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/20/2014 4:34:32 PM

Yeah... Your "facts". I agree 100% with you *sarcasm*.
And once again *you're not your.

guys this can all be solved...

David Lee, Harrison Barnes, and a pick for Kevin Love...

Thats a horrible trade. Horrible.

for the Wolves....

but if the wolves accept the trade they dont have to worry about love leaving for nothing

Ya Mark Jackson is a pastor at a church.

Mark Jackson this season coached the Warriors to their 3rd most winning season in the history of the franchise. Isn't his job to win games? He didn't deserve to be fired.

I never said he deserved to be, I think its a bad thing , its come with the territory in sports.. Some teams are run by the owner wants. Even if the coach is winning championships, he still can be fired or let go .. Jimmy Johnson of Dallas cowboys ring a bell to the same tune.

Its come with the territory.

Also, what are Steve Kerr's credentials? Has he even coached a single game in his career before? I would be fine hiring him as an assistant, but as a head coach? He has no experience coaching in the NBA.

Which are exactly the credentials Mark Jackson had when the Warriors hired him.