BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Best Offense/Defense

Best Offense/Defense

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
97586.18 in reply to 97586.17
Date: 6/18/2009 1:38:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
I said if the other team is way stronger you will lose with any tactic. Yes you figured it out they MAINLY attack with their better offence.
It's pointless to argue with you.
The teams that started in early seasons have dominated because they had way more money and have a big cap compared to teams who started now.
I'm done with this topic.
Conclusion: if you want to have a onesided team play one tactic and do not be surprised if every oponent plays the same defence against you're team.
If you want to be smart you creat an all around team and keep you're opponents guessing.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
97586.19 in reply to 97586.18
Date: 6/18/2009 1:46:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I said if the other team is way stronger you will lose with any tactic.


i don't talk about this cases, why you starting it - i talk about concentrating force and make a team partially stronger.

I said if the other team is way stronger you will lose with any tactic. Yes you figured it out they MAINLY attack with their better offence.
It's pointless to argue with you.


i could say the same ;)

Please take a look -> (34582)

The teams that started in early seasons have dominated because they had way more money and have a big cap compared to teams who started now.


so the next question is, why the teams dominated who started early and concentrate on one offense, and not those who did it the balanced way?

Did all palyer who try it this way, messed up in the areas and only those teams make all right and their only capital failure with the tactic wasn't enough to prevent then from succes.

If you want to be smart you creat an all around team and keep you're opponents guessing.


i though it gonna be to be a succesful team, but smart one maybe i follow your definition ;)

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
97586.20 in reply to 97586.19
Date: 6/18/2009 3:31:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
What to look @ in that team? That he CT-d his last game @ home and won? Proves you're point perfectly:D:D:D

(10998465)
What about these inside players? I won the match away with 20 points + I played 3 subs as starters that game.

Last edited by Kukoc at 6/18/2009 3:33:25 PM

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
97586.21 in reply to 97586.20
Date: 6/18/2009 3:41:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
What to look @ in that team?


that he promote with 4-6k guards into the german bundesliga, has won two games already also with this guards.

And as you said before, the guys play 2-3 against him and he still amnage to win a lot, and have the better rooster because i know his rooster a bit, and was pretty sure that when all Bundesliga rooster will sell their rooster maybe the other teams will get 50-100% more money then him i think in this case it is allowed to paly sometimes NORMAL.

(10998465)
What about these inside players? I won the match away with 20 points + I played 3 subs as starters that game.


i won't say that it is the only way, to specialize. But i show you much example that you get it, that it works like it did with the best teams in thsi game - who reach that level through that.

And indeed you have the stronger rooster then him, and he forget to much about defence you must be able to defend both.

PS: (13107648) - comparavble rooster i think right tactic, and the opponent win to make another example for a specialized team ;) To give them fair examples.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 6/18/2009 3:54:49 PM

Message deleted
From: BNycer

This Post:
00
97586.23 in reply to 97586.11
Date: 6/18/2009 9:53:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I just had probably the worst offensive game of the season for my club. Thanks to my team's mediocre inside defense and being monsters on the offensive boards, we were able to come away with the win. Shot 33% from the field, 61% from the charity line...overall terrible offensive display. I need some help finding the best offense for my club. Right now I don't really know what's the best system for my team offensively. I am making a change though for our next game, moving my current SG to the bench.

From: CrazyEye

To: Coco
This Post:
00
97586.25 in reply to 97586.24
Date: 6/19/2009 3:07:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
thats right this failure comes from time to time into my "dictionary", and i am actually sure my quote f being right is a bit higher then 0,0001% ;)

This Post:
00
97586.26 in reply to 97586.25
Date: 6/19/2009 1:26:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Also, look at the Google pages. Roster is not a related search for Rooster, but Rooster is a related search for Roster. Hmm... your mistake seems to be worse than the reverse of it.

This Post:
00
97586.27 in reply to 97586.26
Date: 6/19/2009 9:06:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
google is affected through my amount of wrong postings ;)

This Post:
00
97586.28 in reply to 97586.14
Date: 6/20/2009 3:18:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
Are actually giving newcomers advice to keep playing just one tactic. My god.
Whoever is reading this and just started please feel free to test out strategies and you can not win every game fielding 4 Centers and a PG + playing inside.


I did exactly what Crazy said and was successful with it: R&G as unique offensive tactics. The rationale is quite obvious for beginner to do so - well rounded inside players are very expensive, however if they flawed, prices drop dramatically. So I renounce on inside shot skills and focus in the acquisition on rebounders and defenders.

With this simple approach starting in season 7 in league 4, I play now second league and it looks like I am relatively competitive. (though have to say that try to shape my team now to become more flexible in offensive tactics). Basically, I believe that without focus on the outside tactics I could have only afforded a much weaker team and probably would have had less success.



Advertisement