BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > New season news?????

New season news?????

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
191779.186 in reply to 191779.182
Date: 7/28/2011 7:37:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I never say that 0,3 level of rebounding for a guard are worth 7 rebounding for a c like you make it up.

0,3 level of rebounding raise the salary of a player(few k,but however raise the salary),without improving his efficiency on the floor.Period
We are going to pay some k more every week,for every player we trained for what,half rebound every game?

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 7/28/2011 7:41:42 AM

This Post:
11
191779.187 in reply to 191779.186
Date: 7/28/2011 8:24:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I never say that 0,3 level of rebounding for a guard are worth 7 rebounding for a c like you make it up.

0,3 level of rebounding raise the salary of a player(few k,but however raise the salary),without improving his efficiency on the floor.Period
We are going to pay some k more every week,for every player we trained for what,half rebound every game?


it increase the effiency on the floor, if you are going to reduce this effect to zero. It don't cost salary too, especially when this 0,3 helps yyou to pay less salary for the same effort.

This Post:
22
191779.188 in reply to 191779.168
Date: 7/28/2011 8:30:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
Yep. Jason Kidd makes all types of catches under the basket in traffic, high above his head. Happens all the time.


I'm probably just going to stop debating someone who knows nothing about basketball.

This Post:
00
191779.189 in reply to 191779.188
Date: 7/28/2011 8:38:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
ha ha ha. Okay by me.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
191779.191 in reply to 191779.190
Date: 7/28/2011 9:31:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I'm not arguing training system shouldn't change. I'm saying has affected a lot of long term plans me and others invested in training their players. We knew the change is coming, but we didn't know how the training will change and couldn't adapt so previous news was something like:

"Training will change!!"

And we were like "Ok, but how???" and continue to train like we have already planned.

And 2 months later: "It will change like this!!"

And we are like "Nooo...!" and thorw the training plan through the window.

From: ned
This Post:
66
191779.192 in reply to 191779.191
Date: 7/28/2011 9:45:00 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
The 99% of the posts here have at least 1 ball...

That's why I'm here

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
00
191779.193 in reply to 191779.191
Date: 7/28/2011 9:46:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I'm not arguing training system shouldn't change. I'm saying has affected a lot of long term plans me and others invested in training their players. We knew the change is coming, but we didn't know how the training will change and couldn't adapt so previous news was something like:

"Training will change!!"

And we were like "Ok, but how???" and continue to train like we have already planned.

And 2 months later: "It will change like this!!"

And we are like "Nooo...!" and thorw the training plan through the window.


I have yet to see anyone explain why this minor change is enough to, as you put it, "throw the training plan through the window." I mean, I understand that when you multiply the anonymity of the Internet and the insanity of any of us who play in a game such as this, exaggeration is going to be given, but if you charted out a training plan for a guy from when he was 18 to 23, for example, the slowdown would require an addiitonal half season to reach the same level, assuming that none of the cross-training went to skills that you wanted trained. And the complaints about salary are even more absurd -- if you're training a G four levels in OD, for example, that's going to have a whole lot more of an effect than a random pop in SB and RB.

This Post:
00
191779.194 in reply to 191779.187
Date: 7/28/2011 9:46:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I never say that 0,3 level of rebounding for a guard are worth 7 rebounding for a c like you make it up.

0,3 level of rebounding raise the salary of a player(few k,but however raise the salary),without improving his efficiency on the floor.Period
We are going to pay some k more every week,for every player we trained for what,half rebound every game?


it increase the effiency on the floor, if you are going to reduce this effect to zero. It don't cost salary too, especially when this 0,3 helps yyou to pay less salary for the same effort.

Are you kidding me?

This Post:
00
191779.195 in reply to 191779.193
Date: 7/28/2011 9:51:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
if you're training a G four levels in OD, for example, that's going to have a whole lot more of an effect than a random pop in SB and RB.


As I already explained in this or another thread today, I can't exactly remember: I'm training a Superstar guard for NT and for that, I have to keep his PA on Prolific (it's already on that level). If in three seasons of training he pops just once in PA, he can't play for NT anymore. If I knew this two seasons ago when I drafted him, I would:

a) sell him, improve my team and promote one season earlier
b) sell him and buy a MVP or HoF

Now if he pops in PA, I'm stuck with a player that will be good, but not good enough for NT and just above-average for D.I where I plan to be in 4-5 seasons. So what should I do? Sell him, buy myself a new 18y old and start anew, setting myself back two seasons? Or train him and risk a pop in PA, knowing this will kill all my plans with him?

This Post:
11
191779.196 in reply to 191779.190
Date: 7/28/2011 9:54:04 AM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
Reminder: People are not machines.

Thank you for listening. You may now go back to arguing about why training should be robotic.


so this confirms the effect is random?
IMO we have enough of it in the games, training should be "robotic"

Advertisement