BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > i o $ -341 339

i o $ -341 339

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
100278.19 in reply to 100278.18
Date: 07/07/2009 12:44:04
Overall Posts Rated:
6565
whatever you say about potential, the fact is if two player have the same qualities, the higher potential will be sold for more even at age 30. you can call it meaningless but this is the fact. as wage goes up, this patern tends to diminish. i also believe there is no difference between an 18 year old 6th man and 22 year old mvp as neither of them is good choices for long term training.

This Post:
00
100278.20 in reply to 100278.19
Date: 07/07/2009 14:00:22
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
whatever you say about potential, the fact is if two player have the same qualities, the higher potential will be sold for more even at age 30.


I think you need to explain this one a bit. Why would I pay more for higher potential at age 30? If anyone is training a guy at that age, they need some sense knocked into their heads.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
100278.21 in reply to 100278.20
Date: 07/07/2009 14:07:10
Overall Posts Rated:
6565
i am not saying anyone should. this is just how market reacts.

This Post:
00
100278.22 in reply to 100278.21
Date: 07/07/2009 16:25:55
Jokehim Maniacs
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
188188
Second Team:
Jokehim Maniacs II
At lower payments I agree that there is a big difference and that people pay too much for potential. But it is mainly newbies that makes this mistake and they have not got enough money to spend $500000 on an old player just because of potential. Even if this user obviously overspent on a high potential player I very much doubt that it is that common that someone will pay as much as $500000 for a useless MVP potential as his player actually is with that age and salary.

And I agree that people overpay for potential. That is the biggest mistake new users does as they tend to believe that potential trains players faster already from start.