BuzzerBeater Forums

I'm not arguing training system shouldn't change. I'm saying has affected a lot of long term plans me and others invested in training their players. We knew the change is coming, but we didn't know how the training will change and couldn't adapt so previous news was something like:

"Training will change!!"

And we were like "Ok, but how???" and continue to train like we have already planned.

And 2 months later: "It will change like this!!"

And we are like "Nooo...!" and thorw the training plan through the window.

I never say that 0,3 level of rebounding for a guard are worth 7 rebounding for a c like you make it up.

0,3 level of rebounding raise the salary of a player(few k,but however raise the salary),without improving his efficiency on the floor.Period
We are going to pay some k more every week,for every player we trained for what,half rebound every game?

it increase the effiency on the floor, if you are going to reduce this effect to zero. It don't cost salary too, especially when this 0,3 helps yyou to pay less salary for the same effort.

if you're training a G four levels in OD, for example, that's going to have a whole lot more of an effect than a random pop in SB and RB.

Reminder: People are not machines.

Thank you for listening. You may now go back to arguing about why training should be robotic.

if you're training a G four levels in OD, for example, that's going to have a whole lot more of an effect than a random pop in SB and RB.

As I already explained in this or another thread today, I can't exactly remember: I'm training a Superstar guard for NT and for that, I have to keep his PA on Prolific (it's already on that level). If in three seasons of training he pops just once in PA, he can't play for NT anymore. If I knew this two seasons ago when I drafted him, I would:

a) sell him, improve my team and promote one season earlier
b) sell him and buy a MVP or HoF

Now if he pops in PA, I'm stuck with a player that will be good, but not good enough for NT and just above-average for D.I where I plan to be in 4-5 seasons. So what should I do? Sell him, buy myself a new 18y old and start anew, setting myself back two seasons? Or train him and risk a pop in PA, knowing this will kill all my plans with him?

Okay, so the change causes difficulty for those who were micromanaging underpotential trainees for fringe NT roles. Get the pitchforks and torches!

I assume that you probably have a very low sublevel of passing for this fine fellow, yes? So given that the cross-training is roughly 10% of normal training and we assume that it hits one of 9 skills at random, every 90 weeks you can expect to have received one week's worth of passing training. Yeah, go ahead and sell your player now - you're screwed. ;)

I never say that 0,3 level of rebounding for a guard are worth 7 rebounding for a c like you make it up.

0,3 level of rebounding raise the salary of a player(few k,but however raise the salary),without improving his efficiency on the floor.Period
We are going to pay some k more every week,for every player we trained for what,half rebound every game?

it increase the effiency on the floor, if you are going to reduce this effect to zero. It don't cost salary too, especially when this 0,3 helps yyou to pay less salary for the same effort.

Are you kidding me?

Okay, so the change causes difficulty for those who were micromanaging underpotential trainees for fringe NT roles. Get the pitchforks and torches!

This change, like all changes in real and internet life, affects all participants. Ones in a good way, others in a bad way. I'm in second group. Does this mean I can't complain?