BuzzerBeater Forums

But we play by NBA rules ;)

Great, then no players under 19 should be allowed on our rosters, right?



Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 8/1/2008 11:51:45 AM

you are presuming ..? but you're the coach of USA U21 so you should know if it's including age 21 .. I think you try to hide something from us

anyway , Canada roster got 21 years old player .. so my information is from there ..
and really why mark and you already shows as the junior team coachs ?

Testing purposes.

Does NBa have any U21? Or should we not have U21 then?

Where's my college team? ;)

Somewhere in the middle of the ACC rankings?



Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 8/1/2008 11:57:50 AM

as I thought ..
so why you act like you don't know nothing ? :-)

I didn't know anything when I first posted.

I was appraised that I was testing earlier this morning.

BTW: Congratz GM!

I was criticizing the specific point of supply and demand, which wouldn't change through faster training.
On the rest of it: that's correct.

Nope. I think the silliness comes from FIFA. Someone in Zurich either doesn't understand the word "under" or can't count. Unfortunately, one error has now infested numerous games (see Hattrick as well).

I think while it could be called silly, it's also convention, and using the standard convention stops a lot of confusion via consistency.

I agree with JuicePats. Following convention is the best way to go. And although this is a basketball manager, following a convention from soccer is not a bad idea since soccer is widely considered to be the most popular sport in the world (many references on wikipedia). And plus, in an international game U doesn't really stand for "under" if you are not an english speaker :D

Last edited by raonne at 8/1/2008 7:17:14 PM

your telling me there isnt a demand for quality players here?

i dont want to start a arguement again, but its already crazy to see that a transaction could reach 10 million or more just for one player in a game that is just 5 seasons old.

if you cant see the gap getting wider then i cant say much anymore.

as i said im shock to see this happening, before i get trainees with 5 respectales and a few average and few atricous and all but i get to buy him on a bidding war and win below 1 million. now i can even see them reaching close to 2 million!

tell me if we could get the market to reach a point wherein the average talent would have skill of average or respectable or so, wouldnt be the buying price of this players go down since we got tons of em in the market.

now with this, if lower divisions can get a hand on this type of players since they dont command salaries reaching 8-10 g's i think they can manage themselves better yet improve this players more surely this help them win games or improve their overall performance but if it would come to a time they can sustain their teams expenses hola! that player is in the trade market much better , more quality and guess what now we see his true value :D