BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - NBBA > Season 12 Smack

Season 12 Smack

Set priority
Show messages by
From: brian

This Post:
00
135547.193 in reply to 135547.190
Date: 4/13/2010 1:12:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
I should mention that I haven't offered a mutual TIE in the last few (4+ I think, probably more) seasons. I really dislike that aspect of the game.


Is that because you haven't needed to? That last time you had any real challenge was season 7. You and Nth were like Celtic and Rangers that season. Since then you've won the league by 8, 7, 9 and 5 games clear of the #2 team.

Nobody loves that aspect of the game, but it's better then playing the moral card and then not being able to compete.

Last edited by brian at 4/13/2010 1:23:30 PM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: stogey23

This Post:
00
135547.194 in reply to 135547.193
Date: 4/13/2010 3:17:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
You and Nth were like Celtic and Rangers that season. Since then you've won the league by 8, 7, 9 and 5 games clear of the #2 team.


Just like Celtic and Rangers this year!

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
From: Dawson

To: Coco
This Post:
00
135547.196 in reply to 135547.195
Date: 4/13/2010 7:47:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
134134
Just like Celtic and Rangers this year!


References to SPL make reading this thread worthwhile. Thank you!

From: stogey23

This Post:
00
135547.197 in reply to 135547.196
Date: 4/13/2010 9:27:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
Just like Celtic and Rangers this year!


References to SPL make reading this thread worthwhile. Thank you!

I know there are at least four huge Maurice Edu fans here, maybe more.

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
This Post:
00
135547.198 in reply to 135547.197
Date: 4/13/2010 9:52:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
Interesting minutes for me, every single player had either 16 or 32 minutes.

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
This Post:
00
135547.199 in reply to 135547.197
Date: 4/13/2010 10:01:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9898
How big does someone have to be in order to be huge?

Very little good has happened in the SPL for a while.

This Post:
00
135547.200 in reply to 135547.199
Date: 4/14/2010 3:20:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Just to make it clear, if I happened to be placed in the big 8 during end of season processing last season I would be trying the same thing against KDB & Bulls. This isn’t a personal vendetta against dhoff, far from it, he just happens to be occupying the top spot in my conference at the moment. I hope another manager gets the ball rolling in the big 8.

As I see it the advantages in BB are gameshape, enthusiasm, and playoff home court. We are able to manage our gameshape through controlling our players minutes (or training it). We are able to manage our enthusiasm through deciding our TIE / N / CT path throughout the season. We control who we play TIE / N / CT against.

However as a group, we choose to gift playoff home court to the same teams every season by LETTING THEM KNOW we are going to TIE against them.

Why?

Essentially teams have become caught up in the automatic TIE (often mutual) against a stronger opposition. It is an easy conclusion to reach, after all the rest of the league is likely to play TIE (possibly mutual) against them as well. Our reasoning is simple: if we don’t do this we fall behind the pack.

I am of the opinion that this line of thinking is WRONG.

The US has had the same 3 teams winning a majority of the trophies & collecting the money each season. The pack has appeared to be patiently waiting for the trophy winning teams to either make mistakes or lose interest in the game. These teams don’t make many mistakes.

There is an order at the moment & we are not closing the gap. What we have been doing as a group is not working. It is time to try something new.

Reasoning

If managers start to show they are willing to play CT against the teams winning trophies this forces the teams that are winning trophies to have to decide which effort level they will select the next time those teams meet.

Banking enthusiasm remains an option; however the decision is no longer automatic when they face the UNKNOWN & realistic possibility of a loss (we have CT'd them before & didn't organise a MTIE this game).

We are taking away their security.

This is going to lead to more normals played by the teams who have won trophies (they want to keep winning) which means LESS ENTHUSIASM FOR THEIR NEXT GAME.

Our actions have removed part of their enthusiasm advantage which increases the chance of them dropping other games as well.

Why go after the teams that are winning trophies?

They have the cash flow. This cash flow allows them to support the trophy winning payroll. They keep on making the cash due to the easy league ride they get from the rest of us.

When we take this easy league ride away from them they lose their enthusiasm advantage. They lose games. Less fans attend their arena. Their cash flow begins to reduce. Their advantage over the rest of us reduces. Another manager takes the top spot & gets the cash flow for a season. We become more even as a group. The order begins to change.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
135547.203 in reply to 135547.200
Date: 4/14/2010 12:17:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
They have the cash flow. This cash flow allows them to support the trophy winning payroll. They keep on making the cash due to the easy league ride they get from the rest of us.


I loved your post, but I would like to point out that I have the 5th highest payroll this season. I'm 80K less than #4, and 147K less than #1. My payroll is only 48K more than #12.

I think my payroll, over the past couple seasons, has consistently been between 5th and 9th overall.

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
Advertisement