BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Weekly raise for the staff

Weekly raise for the staff

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
116916.2 in reply to 116916.1
Date: 10/26/2009 3:15:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
293293
What do you propose to replace it with?

This Post:
00
116916.3 in reply to 116916.1
Date: 10/26/2009 3:49:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
As you have been told already, there are no immediate plans to change this. If you feel there is a better alternative, you can make a suggestion (and no, "stop wage raises for staff" doesn't really qualify as a suggestion).

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
From: robhoe
This Post:
00
116916.4 in reply to 116916.3
Date: 10/27/2009 10:20:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
108108
How about having negotiation periods? At the end of each season a new deal is negotiated (an increased pay rate is listed) You can either choose to re-sign the staff or look for another option.

I have a small recollection that the increase was to encourage the rotation of staff...If this true then have renegotiation half-way through the season (with a more significant increase in wages) or even four times through the year.

It would allow for a more "realistic" handling of staff wages, while (possibly) still meeting the same outcomes as the current system.

This Post:
00
116916.5 in reply to 116916.4
Date: 10/27/2009 10:29:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Just like NBA Live has the off-season staff negotiations...

This Post:
00
116916.6 in reply to 116916.4
Date: 10/27/2009 10:51:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
How about having negotiation periods? At the end of each season a new deal is negotiated (an increased pay rate is listed) You can either choose to re-sign the staff or look for another option.


You essentially get that option on a weekly basis.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
116916.7 in reply to 116916.6
Date: 10/27/2009 10:59:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
108108
This is true...

it is simply a suggestion as to how a balance might be found between the outcome of staff rotation and the (in the opinion of some) anomalous staff payroll situation.

Can I assume it is not likely to be considered?

From: Pika^^
This Post:
00
116916.8 in reply to 116916.7
Date: 10/27/2009 7:54:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Year raises instead weekly raises. And in a lower % too.
Like the players raise their salary only per year, staff would also raise their salary per year, but only 1k or something like that. Why would a manager level 5, cost 22k in the start of the season and ends it costing 30k? He still is a level 5 manager, so I don´t understand it.

Oh, and manager could also improved their skill, of course that would cost money, but it would become more real. But the improvement shall be reaally slow, because a player improves quicker than a manager in real life.

This Post:
00
116916.9 in reply to 116916.8
Date: 10/28/2009 10:13:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155

Oh, and manager could also improved their skill, of course that would cost money, but it would become more real. But the improvement shall be reaally slow, because a player improves quicker than a manager in real life.


I don't see why a manager should improve their skill over time - unless you pay money for training him or something like that.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
116916.10 in reply to 116916.9
Date: 10/28/2009 10:35:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
You can do this right now. It's called buying a new staff member -- you pay money, his skill improves.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
116916.11 in reply to 116916.10
Date: 10/28/2009 4:39:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
You can do this right now. It's called buying a new staff member -- you pay money, his skill improves.

With level 7 too?

This Post:
00
116916.12 in reply to 116916.10
Date: 10/29/2009 3:17:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
LOL, you know what I meant.

Advertisement