I don't get it.
The idea of this tax only refers to player that are not sold.
Therefore for your 2 examples, there would be no more tax than the 3% already existing.
On the contrary, if both would not be sold, there would be a tax :
- over the Player 3 (and why not only if the price is not btewwen the BB estimation. Right now, it would not be necssarily good because Bb estims are not everytime fair, but with this suggestion, prices would become more fair and BB-estims too).
- And not more tax for the player for 4 than the one already existing.
This is more à preventive tax than an executive tax, according to what I understood
Last edited by Dunker Joe at 2/20/2010 9:37:14 AM