BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
Suggestions > Scale up heights
Back to the Sneak Peek
Suggestions
Customized skill display
3
Teamworks
15
Audience
3
Training Plans
3
FIBA Lane for International Ga...
2
Team Lineup
1
Disable gameshape in 1st week
9
Manager NT History
5
Disabling animated gifs on for...
9
Jerseys
82
Scale up heights
14
New skin
6
Blocks in live games
10
New Team Rating System
27
Player History (BBB)
1
Cross-training
28
Moratorium on ALL new changes ...
155
south africa community
16
Suggestion?
3
Player focus on training
7
<
>
Favorite Folders
Scale up heights
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
CrazyEye (1)
GM-Perpete (2)
B.B.King (3)
Hadron (5)
Wolph (1)
Coolbobj (1)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
Hadron
To:
GM-Perpete
This Post:
0
191728.3
in reply to
191728.2
Date: 7/27/2011 3:20:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
And a good one it is at that. But wouldn't you like it better if you could have 6'4 PGs 6'6 SGs and 6'8 SFs? ehhh I'm just a little bugged because I drafted this great MVP SF and he's 6'5. I have half a mind to sell him everytime I look at him.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Hadron
To:
GM-Perpete
This Post:
0
191728.5
in reply to
191728.4
Date: 7/27/2011 7:02:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
The metric system is more sensible, definitely. But with heights, I'm used to feet and inches. Anyway, I looked up the conversions for you and anyone else who is not familiar.
6 feet = 183 cm. And 1 inch = 2.5 cm. So a 6'8 SF would be 203 cm, a 6'6 SG would be 198 cm, etc.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
B.B.King
To:
Hadron
This Post:
0
191728.6
in reply to
191728.1
Date: 7/27/2011 4:59:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1206
In World Cup final played 4 Small Forwards - 3x 201cm + 1x 206 cm ;-)
In this strange system with feet and inches it should be 6'7" and 6'9" ;-)
And one more thing. If You check TL You shouldn't look at best position, it practically doesn't matter. In my opinion quite good Small Forward could have PF or even PG as best position.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Coolbobj
To:
Hadron
This Post:
0
191728.7
in reply to
191728.1
Date: 7/27/2011 7:57:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
152
Rookie SFs don't matter, many players have their positions changed depending how they were trained. Also many SFs in BB are SGs with decent ID, so they tend to be short. As far as some elite "NBA" type SFs there are some who are taller and are true SFs:
(9469959)
(5829870)
(4526936)
(4667257)
(5728352)
Check the Suggestions they are important
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Hadron
To:
B.B.King
This Post:
0
191728.8
in reply to
191728.6
Date: 7/28/2011 4:21:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Sure players change positions and there will be a few top players who will have the right range of heights. I'm talking about proportions though. If players with certain heights for certain positions are fed into the game then those ratios will not be very different at a later time. Thats just law of averages.
Only way to sort this out is to feed a higher proportion of taller players for PG SG SF in the draft each season. And change optimal training heights.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
B.B.King
To:
Hadron
This Post:
0
191728.9
in reply to
191728.8
Date: 7/28/2011 5:24:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1206
I was scout of 18yo players in Poland for many years. And I think that players with best position SF after draft are in average worse than other players. The best candidates for SF have best position as PF.
I think reason is here that in formula of salary SF has only 5 skills (impact of 5 other skills is 0 or very low). And JS for SF is the most expensive skill in BB. And therefore I saw many SFs with many "black holes". Very ofthen they have only high JS and RB, a little JR, OD or ID and other skills = 1-3.
And one more thing. If player have all 10 skills on the same level his best position is PF, not SF.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Hadron
To:
B.B.King
This Post:
0
191728.10
in reply to
191728.9
Date: 7/28/2011 11:49:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
:D SFs with black holes. Nice.
I don't know if the best SFs are PFs, seems a lot of teams play an SG type player at SF, especially if they play outside oriented offence. But that's a different matter.
All that jazz aside, it'd be nice if this game got more realistic in simple ways.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
B.B.King
To:
Hadron
This Post:
0
191728.11
in reply to
191728.10
Date: 7/29/2011 6:25:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1206
:D SFs with black holes. Nice.
It's effect of salary formula. But as I said before best position doesn't matter. And my tip is: never look at best position ;-)
First example:
JS, JR, OD, ID, RB = 7
HN, DV, PS, IS, BS = 1
sum of 10 basic skills = 40
best position = SF
salary = 6260
Second example:
All skills = 5
sum of 10 basic skills = 50
best position = PF
salary = 2641
Third example:
All skills = 6
sum of 10 basic skills = 60
best position = PF
salary = 4159
(formula of salary from previous season, of course by Josef Ka).
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
CrazyEye
To:
B.B.King
This Post:
0
191728.12
in reply to
191728.11
Date: 7/29/2011 6:34:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959
even when i would say your example player one is probadly the best at SF, but like you mentioned before they are often shooting guards without OD.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Disable Emoticons and Images